Key result
Among patients undergoing PCI with an OAC indication, 81% were prescribed triple therapy on discharge, with no significant difference in risk scores compared to alternate regimens.
Why the study?
The optimal oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy combination and duration after PCI in patients with an indication for both are not known.
What are the real-world prescribing patterns and rationales for combined OAC and antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI with an indication for OAC?
Observational (n=1,650)
What are the real-world prescribing patterns and rationales for combined OAC and antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI with an indication for OAC?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.6% vs 3.8%
p-value: p=0.37
There is high variability and limited application of risk scoring systems in the real-world selection and duration of combined OAC and antiplatelet therapy post-PCI.
Provides real-world OAC/APT selection data post-PCI; leaves open optimal regimen and duration.
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a clinical indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) in addition to antiplatelet therapy (APT) necessitate rigorous evaluation of bleeding and ischemic risk to guide therapy. The optimal OAC/APT drug combination and duration of treatment is not known. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of patients undergoing PCI with an OAC indication and the rationale for post-PCI combined OAC/APT selection in clinical practice. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with an indication for combined OAC/APT were included in a 12-month retrospective case series. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, prescribed OAC/APT regimens, and rationale for drug selection were reviewed. PCI was performed in 1650 patients during the study period, with an indication for OAC/APT in 133 (8.1%). A combination of aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitor, and OAC was the most frequently prescribed regime on discharge (n = 103, 81%). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in combination with OAC was continued for a mean duration of 6.4 ± 4.4 weeks (range 3-52 weeks) before one antiplatelet was discontinued. There was no significant difference between the mean CHA2DS2-VASc or HAS-BLED score of patients with atrial fibrillation discharged on OAC/DAPT compared with alternate combinations (DAPT alone or OAC/single APT), 3.6 ± 1.3 versus 3.8 ± 1, P = 0.37 and 2.04 ± 0.7 versus 2.05 ± 1.0, P = 0.98, respectively. This case series identifies high variability in OAC/APT treatment duration and limited application of risk scoring systems and high-risk PCI characteristics in the selection of OAC/APT regimens. A more systematic patient assessment is needed to help standardize OAC/APT prescribing for this important patient cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanner et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing PCI with an indication for oral anticoagulation (n=1,650). Combined oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy vs. Alternate combinations (DAPT alone or OAC/single APT) was evaluated on Mean CHA2DS2-VASc score to evaluate rationale for drug selection (p=0.37). Among patients undergoing PCI with an OAC indication, 81% were prescribed triple therapy on discharge, with no significant difference in risk scores compared to alternate regimens.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: