Why the study?
What is the optimal antithrombotic therapy following PCI for patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation?
What is the optimal antithrombotic therapy following PCI for patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation?
This review provides a framework for clinical decision-making, highlighting that omitting aspirin or limiting DAPT to 1-3 months after PCI in patients on OAC may mitigate bleeding risks without increasing ischemic events.
May inform bleeding minimization in OAC patients post-PCI; leaves open prospective RCT confirmation.
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to prevent stent thrombosis. The optimal antithrombotic therapy following PCI for patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) is uncertain. DAPT and OAC, a combination known as 'triple therapy', reduces cardiovascular event rates but is associated with a substantial risk of bleeding. Recent data suggest that the duration of DAPT (and thereby triple therapy in those who also require OAC) can be limited to 1-3 months following new-generation drug-eluting stent deployment, and that aspirin may be omitted from triple therapy, without increasing the rate of ischaemic cardiovascular events. The increasing use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor) has further complicated antithrombotic prescribing. This article aims to provide a summary of the evidence regarding antithrombotic therapy after PCI in patients who have an indication for OAC and to provide a framework to aid clinical decision-making in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallagher et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: