Key result
Novel hybrid mice develop severe EV71 CNS disease at a ~1000-fold lower viral titer.
Why the study?
A more user-friendly and robust animal model is essential to investigate EV71 pathogenesis.
The novel hybrid hSCARB2(+/+)/stat-1(-/-) mouse strain provides a highly susceptible and robust animal model for investigating EV71 pathogenesis and therapeutics.
New hybrid mouse model extends EV71 pathogenesis tools; hypothesis-generating with unclear human translation.
Enterovirus 71 (EV71) is a major threat to children worldwide. Children infected with EV71 could develop subclinical infection and hand-foot-and -mouth disease (HFMD). In severe cases, patients could develop encephalitis, paralysis, pulmonary edema, and death. A more user-friendly and robust animal model is essential to investigating EV71 pathogenesis. Here, we established a hybrid (hSCARB2(+/+)/stat-1(-/-)) mouse strain from crossbreeding SCARB2 transgenic and stat-1 KO mice, and compared the susceptibilities to EV71 infection and pathogenesis between parental and hybrid mice. Virus-encoded VP1 protein can be detected in the streaking nerve fibers in brain and spinal cord. This hybrid mouse strain at 2-week-old age can still be infected with different genotypes of EV71 at 1000-fold lower titer via an ip route. Infected hybrid mice developed earlier onset of CNS disease, paralysis, and death at a higher incidence. These advantages of this novel model meet the urgent need from the scientific community in basic and preclinical research in therapeutics and pathogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liou et al. (2016) studied Enterovirus 71 (EV71) infection. EV71 infection in hSCARB2+/+/stat-1-/- hybrid mice vs. Parental stat-1-/- and hSCARB2+/+ transgenic mice was evaluated on Clinical score, paralysis rate, and survival rate. The novel hybrid mouse strain (hSCARB2+/+/stat-1-/-) is highly susceptible to EV71 infection, developing earlier onset of CNS disease, paralysis, and death at a 1000-fold lower viral titer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: