Key result
Chest wall stimulation terminates endless loop tachycardia in 100% of cases, beating chest thumping.
Why the study?
Do chest wall stimulation, myopotential oversensing, or chest thumping terminate pacemaker endless loop tachycardia in patients with DDD pacemakers?
Do chest wall stimulation, myopotential oversensing, or chest thumping terminate pacemaker endless loop tachycardia in patients with DDD pacemakers?
Simple techniques such as chest wall stimulation, myopotential oversensing, and chest thumping can effectively terminate pacemaker endless loop tachycardia without requiring a magnet or programmer.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chest wall stimulation may terminate endless loop tachycardia; hypothesis-generating in a case report and requires prospective validation before practice change.
PURPOSE: Pacemaker endless loop (or reentrant) tachycardia (ELT) is often terminated by conversion to the asynchronous mode of pacing by simply placing a magnet over the implanted atrial tracking (DDD or VDD) pacemaker. We investigated three other simple methods of ELT termination--chest wall stimulation (CWS), provocation of myopotential oversensing, and chest thumping--that may be useful when the arrhythmia is unresponsive to magnet application or a magnet is unavailable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A modified CWS technique using an external pulse generator (pulse width = 40 msec) ordinarily used for transcutaneous cardiac pacing was tested in 74 patients (40 with unipolar and 34 with bipolar DDD devices). CWS inhibited the ventricular channel of all DDD pacemakers easily and reliably. CWS was then applied during ELT in 20 patients (10 with unipolar and 10 with bipolar DDD devices). Provocation of myopotential oversensing by the ventricular channel was attempted during ELT in 10 patients with unipolar DDD pacemakers. Chest thumping was tried during ELT in six patients. RESULTS: CWS by the modified technique terminated ELT in all patients in whom the arrhythmia was induced. Myopotential oversensing resulted in successful ELT termination in six of the 10 patients. ELT was successfully terminated by chest thumping in four of six patients. CONCLUSION: These simple techniques provide effective ways of ELT termination other than magnet application, and may be easily applied by physicians unfamiliar with the complexities of contemporary DDD pacemakers and their programmers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barold et al. (1988) studied Pacemaker endless loop tachycardia (n=74). Chest wall stimulation, provocation of myopotential oversensing, and chest thumping was evaluated on Termination of endless loop tachycardia. Chest wall stimulation terminated endless loop tachycardia in 100% (20/20) of tested patients, while myopotential oversensing and chest thumping succeeded in 60% (6/10) and 67% (4/6), respectively.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: