Key result
Routine platelet function testing holds strong scientific rationale for patients undergoing PCI.
Why the study?
Should routine platelet testing be done on all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Should routine platelet testing be done on all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
The review highlights the scientific rationale for routine platelet function testing in patients undergoing PCI to assess clopidogrel response and minimize stent thrombosis risk.
Routine platelet testing lacks support for all PCI patients; leaves open selective use in high-risk cases for prospective validation.
Should routine platelet testing be done on all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?The Evidence Base for Platelet Function Testing in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Matthew J. Price, MD C lopidogrel therapy significantly reduces cardiovascular events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) 1,2 and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 3 yet cardiovascular events, including stent thrombosis, continue to occur after PCI despite the ischemic benefit conferred by clopidogrel.Minimizing the incidence of stent thrombosis is a central goal for stent manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory bodies, and practicing interventional cardiologists, and professional societies have formally recommended prolonged thienopyridine therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in the absence of randomized controlled clinical trials.4 A growing body of data supports the contention that the level of platelet reactivity on clopidogrel therapy ("on-treatment" platelet reactivity) is an independent risk factor for ischemic and thrombotic events post-PCI and that the intensification of platelet inhibition may improve outcomes in at-risk patients.The introduction of point-of-care and clinical laboratory-based platelet function assays has made it feasible to consider the routine evaluation of on-treatment platelet reactivity in the patient undergoing PCI.5,6 The current data set provides clinicians with a strong scientific rationale for the use of platelet function assays in daily practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew J. Price (2010) conducted a review in Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelet function testing was evaluated. Routine evaluation of on-treatment platelet reactivity using platelet function assays has a strong scientific rationale for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: