Key result
CV risk factors in older adults linked to ~11% higher LVMI and reduced contractility.
Why the study?
Understanding the relationship of cardiovascular structure and function to age is confounded by the high prevalence of traditional risk factors in the United States.
Does the presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors affect left ventricular and aortic structural and functional parameters in an aging population?
Cohort (n=3,015)
Yes
Does the presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors affect left ventricular and aortic structural and functional parameters in an aging population?
Absolute Event Rate: 66.9% vs 60.2%
p-value: p=<0.05
Left ventricular structure and function are better preserved in aging individuals without traditional cardiovascular risk factors, with this protection being more prominent in men.
CV risk factors associated with adverse LV remodeling in aging adults; hypothesis-generating, should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the relationship of cardiovascular structure and function to age is confounded by the high prevalence of traditional risk factors in the United States. The purpose of the study is to compare left ventricular (LV) and aortic structural, and functional parameters in individuals with and without traditional risk factors in a population-based cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: 3015 study participants (48% men, age 55-94, mean 69.01±9.17 years) in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging from 2010-2012. Absence of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (no hypertension, diabetes or impaired fasting glucose, obesity, smoking or hypercholesterolemia) was infrequent, occurring in just 314 (10.4%, 38% men) of 3015 participants. In multivariable analyses adjusting for age, sex and race, individuals with CV risk factors had significantly larger LV mass index (by 17%) and lower LV contractibility (circumference strain, lower by 14%). Indexed LV volumes and stroke volume were inversely associated with age, but such relationships were not statistically significant in risk-free male subjects (p>0.05). Men with CV risk factors showed positive association of CMR T1 indices of myocardial fibrosis with age. Aortic function was similar in individuals with and without risk factors; age was associated with decline of aortic function in both CV and no CV risk factor groups. CONCLUSION: Our results support that LV structure and function are better preserved in senescent hearts in the absence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and such protection is more prominent in men than in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular risk factors and healthy aging (n=3,015). Cardiovascular risk factors vs. Absence of cardiovascular risk factors was evaluated on Left ventricular mass index (g/m2) (p=<0.05). The presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors in older adults was associated with a significantly larger left ventricular mass index and lower left ventricular contractibility compared to risk-free individuals.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: