Key result
Type 1 diabetes linked to ~322% higher prevalence of anti-CV-B4 neutralizing activity in saliva versus controls.
Why the study?
Is anti-CV-B4 neutralizing activity in saliva higher in patients with type 1 diabetes compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=316)
Yes
Is anti-CV-B4 neutralizing activity in saliva higher in patients with type 1 diabetes compared to controls?
Odds Ratio: 4.22 (95% CI 1.9–9.38)
p-value: p=0.0002
Anti-CV-B4 neutralizing activity in saliva is significantly higher in patients with type 1 diabetes compared to controls, suggesting its potential as a non-invasive marker for studying the viral pathogenesis of the disease.
Higher salivary anti-CV-B4 in type 1 diabetes should not yet change practice; leaves open its role as a non-invasive marker for viral pathogenesis.
BACKGROUND: Coxsackieviruses B (CV-B) are enteroviruses that have been reported to play a role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. Enteroviral RNA was detected in the gut mucosa of patients. The mucosal immunity is an interconnected network; therefore, the response to enteroviruses possibly present in the gastrointestinal mucosa can be reflected by specific antibodies in the saliva. In the present study, the anti-CV-B neutralizing activity of saliva samples from patients with type 1 diabetes was investigated. METHODS: Saliva samples were collected from patients and controls of 3 countries, and plasma was obtained from some of them. The anti-CV-B activity of clinical samples was determined by neutralization of the cytopathic effect induced by challenging viruses in vitro and expressed as titre value. RESULTS: Overall prevalence and levels of anti-CV-B4 activity of saliva were higher in patients (n = 181) than in controls (n = 135; P = .0002; titre values ≥ 16: odds ratio = 4.22 95% CI: 1.90-9.38 P = .0002). It has been shown that IgA1 played a role in this activity. There was no correlation between the saliva and the plasma anti-CV-B4 neutralizing activity. The neutralizing activity of saliva against CV-B1, CV-B2, CV-B3, and CV-B5 existed rarely, if at all. Increased levels of anti-CV-B4 activity were observed all along a 4 year follow-up period in patients but not in matched controls (P = .01). CONCLUSION: There is an anti-CV-B4 activity in saliva of patients with type 1 diabetes that may be a useful marker to study the role of CV-B in the pathogenesis of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badia‐Boungou et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Type 1 diabetes (n=316). Type 1 diabetes vs. Controls without type 1 diabetes was evaluated on Anti-CV-B4 activity of saliva (titre values ≥ 16) (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.90-9.38, p=0.0002). Patients with type 1 diabetes had a significantly higher prevalence of anti-CV-B4 neutralizing activity in saliva compared to controls (OR 4.22; 95% CI 1.90-9.38; P=0.0002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: