Key result
Allometric scaling of LVM for height reliably reproduces the centile curves method with >0.98 concordance.
Why the study?
Although the allometrically adjusted ratio of LVM to height^2.7 is commonly used, normative pediatric data recommend centile curves, leaving it unclear whether allometric ratios reliably reproduce centile curve normalization.
Does the allometrically adjusted LVM-to-height ratio reliably reproduce the results of LVM normalization based on the centile curves method in children?
Cross-Sectional (n=791)
Does the allometrically adjusted LVM-to-height ratio reliably reproduce the results of LVM normalization based on the centile curves method in children?
Effect estimate: Concordance correlation coefficient 0.9917-0.9916 for girls and 0.9886-0.9869 for boys
Allometric scaling of left ventricular mass for height in children accurately reproduces the results of the centile curves method, supporting its use in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Normalization for body size is required for reliable left ventricular mass (LVM) evaluation, especially in children due to the large variability of body size. In clinical practice, the allometrically adjusted ratio of LVM to height raised to the power of 2.7 is often used. However, studies presenting normative LVM data for children recommend centile curves as optimal for the development of normative data. This study aimed to assess whether the allometrically adjusted LVM-to-height ratio can reliably reproduce the results of LVM normalization for height based on the centile curves method. METHODS: Left ventricular mass was computed for 464 boys and 327 girls, 5-18 years old, based on echocardiographic examination. Normalized data representing LVM for height were developed using the centile curves construction method and two variants of the allometrically adjusted ratio method: one variant with the allometric exponents specific to the study groups, and one variant with the universal exponent of 2.7. The agreement between the allometric methods and the centile curves method was analyzed using the concordance correlation coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: For both the specific allometric variant and the universal variant, the analysis of concordance has indicated high reproducibility compared to the centile curves method. The respective coefficient values were 0.9917 and 0.9916 for girls, and 0.9886 and 0.9869 for boys. The sensitivity and specificity test has also shown high agreement. However, for girls, the sensitivity was higher for the specific variant (100% vs. 90.9%). CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that allometric scaling of LVM for height can very reliably reproduce the results of LVM normalization for height based on the centile curves method. However, the analysis of sensitivity and specificity indicates greater agreement for the allometric normalization with the group-specific allometric exponents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krysztofiak et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular mass evaluation (n=791). Allometrically adjusted ratio method vs. Centile curves method was evaluated on Agreement between allometric methods and centile curves method (Concordance correlation coefficient 0.9917-0.9916 for girls and 0.9886-0.9869 for boys). Allometric scaling of left ventricular mass for height reliably reproduced the centile curves method, with concordance correlation coefficients >0.98 for both specific and universal variants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: