Key result
Vav2 disruption in mice causes tachycardia and hypertension via chronic renin-angiotensin and sympathetic stimulation.
Why the study?
Vav2 and Vav3 are highly expressed in nonhematopoietic tissues, suggesting additional functions outside blood cells that are not well understood.
Does the loss of the Vav2 proto-oncogene cause cardiovascular disease in mice?
Does the loss of the Vav2 proto-oncogene cause cardiovascular disease in mice?
Vav2 plays a crucial role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis, and its loss leads to tachycardia and hypertension via renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous system activation.
The Vav family is a group of signal transduction molecules that activate Rho/Rac GTPases during cell signaling. Experiments using knockout mice have indicated that the three Vav proteins present in mammals (Vav1, Vav2, and Vav3) are essential for proper signaling responses in hematopoietic cells. However, Vav2 and Vav3 are also highly expressed in nonhematopoietic tissues, suggesting that they may have additional functions outside blood cells. Here, we report that this is the case for Vav2, because the disruption of its locus in mice causes tachycardia, hypertension, and defects in the heart, arterial walls, and kidneys. We also provide physiological and pharmacological evidence demonstrating that the hypertensive condition of Vav2-deficient mice is due to a chronic stimulation of the renin/angiotensin II and sympathetic nervous systems. Together, these results indicate that Vav2 plays crucial roles in the maintenance of cardiovascular homeostasis in mice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sauzeau et al. (2007) studied Cardiovascular disease. Vav2 locus disruption was evaluated on Cardiovascular phenotype (tachycardia, hypertension, structural defects). Disruption of the Vav2 locus in mice causes tachycardia, hypertension, and cardiovascular defects due to chronic stimulation of the renin/angiotensin II and sympathetic nervous systems.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: