Key result
Handheld O'Dive Doppler shows poor agreement with 2D ultrasound for grading venous gas emboli.
Why the study?
Intravascular bubble load after decompression can be scored using ultrasound to measure venous gas emboli, but the agreement between a handheld self-positioning device and 2D cardiac ultrasound was unstudied.
Does the handheld self-positioning Doppler product (O'Dive) agree with 2D cardiac ultrasound for grading venous gas emboli after decompression?
Observational
Does the handheld self-positioning Doppler product (O'Dive) agree with 2D cardiac ultrasound for grading venous gas emboli after decompression?
The handheld O'Dive Doppler product has fair to poor agreement and lower sensitivity for detecting venous gas emboli compared to standard 2D cardiac ultrasound after decompression.
Supports feasibility of self-administered VGE monitoring in divers; leaves open correlation with decompression sickness risk.
INTRODUCTION: Intravascular bubble load after decompression can be detected and scored using ultrasound techniques that measure venous gas emboli (VGE). The aim of this study was to analyse the agreement between ultrasonic bubble grades from a handheld self-positioning product, the O'Dive™, and cardiac 2D ultrasound after decompression. METHODS: VGE were graded with both bilateral subclavian vein Doppler ultrasound (modified Spencer scale) and 2D cardiac images (Eftedal Brubakk scale). Agreement was analysed using weighted kappa (Kw). Analysis with Kw was made for all paired grades, including measurements with and without zero grades, and for each method's highest grades after each dive. RESULTS: A total of 152 dives yielded 1,113 paired measurements. The Kw agreement between ultrasound VGE grades produced by cardiac 2D images and those from the O'Dive was 'fair'; when zero grades were excluded the agreement was 'poor'. The O'Dive was found to have a lower sensitivity to detect VGE compared to 2D cardiac image scoring. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 2D cardiac image ultrasound, the O'Dive yielded generally lower VGE grades, which resulted in a low level of agreement (fair to poor) with Kw.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plogmark et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Intravascular bubble load after decompression. Handheld self-positioning Doppler product (O'Dive™) vs. 2D cardiac ultrasound was evaluated on Agreement between ultrasonic bubble grades using weighted kappa (Kw). The handheld O'Dive Doppler product showed fair to poor agreement with 2D cardiac ultrasound for grading venous gas emboli after decompression, demonstrating lower sensitivity for detecting bubbles.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: