Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 2, 2021AntioxidantsOpen Access

LC-MS Based Analysis and Biological Properties of Pseudocedrela kotschyi (Schweinf.) Harms Extracts: A Valuable Source of Antioxidant, Antifungal, and Antibacterial Compounds

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

KSKouadio Ibrahime SinanSDStefano Dall’AcquaIFIrene Ferrarese

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

In vitro study reveals potent antioxidant, antimicrobial, and enzyme inhibitory properties in Pseudocedrela kotschyi extracts, highlighting their therapeutic potential.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the phenolic profiles, antioxidant potential, enzyme inhibitory activities, and antimicrobial actions of leaf and stem bark extracts of Pseudocedrela kotschyi prepared with methanol and water.
  • Extracted leaves and stem bark of Pseudocedrela kotschyi using methanol and water as solvents.
  • Identified and quantified bioactive phytochemicals using two distinct LC-DAD-MSn methods.
  • Tested extracts across multiple antioxidant assays, enzyme inhibition models (AChE, BChE, tyrosinase, α-glucosidase, α-amylase, elastase), and antimicrobial panels against various fungal and bacterial strains.
  • Methanol stem bark extract yielded the highest total phenolics (131.83 ± 1.81 mg GAE/g) and flavanols (14.14 ± 0.11 mg CE/g), showing superior antioxidant activity across DPPH (1.94 ± 0.01 mmol TE/g) and ABTS (3.31 ± 0.01 mmol TE/g) assays.
  • Methanol stem bark extracts demonstrated the greatest inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (2.54 mg GALAE/g) and butyrylcholinesterase (5.48 mg GALAE/g), whereas leaf extracts most effectively inhibited tyrosinase (77.39 ± 0.21 mg KAE/g) and α-glucosidase (0.97 ± 0.01 mmol ACAE/g).
  • All extracts exhibited broad antifungal activity against species including A. ochraceus and T. viride, alongside antibacterial efficacy against human pathogens including S. aureus and E. coli.

Cite This Study

Sinan et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa95b77398b99bbe68cc5f5https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10101570
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative LC–MS Analysis and In Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Enzyme Inhibitory Properties of Ultrasound‐Assisted and Soxhlet Extracts of <i>Cachrys cristata</i> DC.2025
  2. 2LC‐MS Analysis and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Extracts of <i>Spondias purpurea</i> L2025
  3. 3LC–ESI–MS/MS Profiling and In Vitro Evaluation of Antioxidant, Enzymatic Inhibitory, and Cytotoxic Activities, Along With Complementary In Vitro and In Silico Assessment of the Antibacterial Potential of <i>Centaurea papposa</i> Leaf Extracts2025
  4. 4LC-MS/MS-based phytochemical profiling of Erythrina caffra leaves, isolation of a novel sterol glycoside, and evaluation of antioxidant, cytotoxic, and anti-sars-cov-2 activities2026
  5. 5Comparative liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry profiling and bioactivity evaluation of <scp> <i>Ebenus macrophylla</i> </scp> Jaub. &amp; Spach leaf, stalk and root extracts: an <scp> <i>in vitro</i> </scp> and <scp> <i>in silico</i> </scp> approach2025 · 5 citations