Key result
Fine-needle aspiration correctly identifies ~59% of angiosarcomas but struggles with cell-poor and low-grade variants.
Why the study?
The cytological features of angiosarcomas, including classic and epithelioid variants, require characterization to improve tumor typing accuracy.
Observational (n=23)
The wide spectrum of cellular components in angiosarcomas makes accurate tumor typing difficult, especially with cell-poor samples and low-grade classic variants.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FNA angiosarcoma typing warrants caution in cell-poor or low-grade samples; leaves open the need for histologic correlation in diagnosis.
To characterize the cytological features of angiosarcomas, we reviewed the fine-needle aspiration material and corresponding histologic sections of 29 tumors in 23 patients. Histologically, 24 tumors were of the classic type, and 5 were epithelioid angiosarcomas. The original corresponding cytologic diagnoses were as follows: angiosarcoma, 17 cases; sarcoma not otherwise specified, 8 cases; and rhabdomyosarcoma, 1 case. Three samples were cell-poor and were considered suspicious of malignancy. The review of cytology samples showed that smears were cell-rich in 17 tumors and cell-poor in 12 tumors. A hemorrhagic background was present in 9 cases. Tumor cells were polymorphous, including spindle-shaped, round to oval, and polygonal epithelioid cells and giant cells in different proportions. Erythrophagocytosis was seen in 12 tumors. Smears of classic angiosarcomas were polymorphous and lacking specific characteristics, whereas smears of epithelioid tumors were morphologically similar and composed of round to oval and polygonal, epithelial cells frequently arranged in clusters, and showing erythrophagocytosis. The wide spectrum of cellular components of angiosarcomas accounts for the difficulty in establishing accurate tumor typing, particularly with cell-poor samples and low-grade classic angiosarcoma. Entities to consider in the differential diagnosis are carcinoma, epithelioid sarcoma, pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma, and malignant melanoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klijanienko et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Angiosarcoma (n=23). Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs. Histologic sections was evaluated on Cytological features and diagnostic accuracy. Fine-needle aspiration cytology correctly identified angiosarcoma in 17 of 29 tumors, but accurate tumor typing was difficult, particularly with cell-poor samples and low-grade classic variants.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: