Key result
Collaborative simulation rotation increases anastomosis scores by ~83% in junior surgery residents.
Why the study?
Integrated CTS and VS residents must achieve operative independence faster than traditional trainees, making early technical skill development paramount.
Does a collaborative simulation rotation improve technical skills and confidence in junior cardiothoracic and vascular surgery residents?
Cohort (n=12)
No
Does a collaborative simulation rotation improve technical skills and confidence in junior cardiothoracic and vascular surgery residents?
A dedicated collaborative simulation rotation significantly accelerates technical skill progression and increases confidence among junior cardiothoracic and vascular surgery residents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support simulation training for junior surgical residents; leaves open need for randomized trials on clinical outcomes.
Integrated cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) and vascular surgery (VS) residents must achieve operative independence in fewer years compared with residents in traditional training paradigms. Developing a strong foundation early in training from which to build technical skills is of paramount importance. We hypothesized that intensive simulation performed by CTS and VS junior residents would accelerate technical skill progression and improve confidence. In July 2021, 7 post-graduate year (PGY)-1 and 5 PGY-2 residents from integrated CTS and VS programs at a single institution participated in a collaborative simulation rotation. Training included low-fidelity vascular anastomoses, high-fidelity cadaver operative simulation, and core surgical tasks. Residents rated confidence levels before and after training. Performance during end-to-end and end-to-side vascular anastomoses (pre- and post-simulation) were evaluated for: respect for tissue, time and motion, needle handling, needle angles, and knot tying. End-to-end anastomosis scores increased from 10.4 to 19 (p < .001); completion times reduced from 10.8 to 8.7 min (p = .02). End-to-side anastomosis scores increased from 11.4 to 14.6 (p < .001); completion time was unchanged at 8.8 vs. 8.9 min. Trainee confidence level increased for these core tasks: knot tying (3.4 vs 4.1, p = .03), end-to-end anastomosis (2.1 vs 3.6, p < .01), end-to-side anastomosis (1.9 vs 3.3, p < .01), Castroviejo needle driver handling (2.7 vs 3.8, p < .01), ultrasound guided vascular access (2.4 vs 3.5, p = .01), bronchoscopy (1.8 vs 3.1, p = .01), and chest tube placement (1.9 vs 3.1, p < .01). Dedicated collaborative simulation focusing on technical skills relevant to both CTS and VS trainees accelerates skills progression and increases resident confidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javorski et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Surgical training (n=12). Collaborative simulation rotation vs. Pre-simulation baseline was evaluated on End-to-end anastomosis scores (p=<0.001). A collaborative simulation rotation for junior cardiothoracic and vascular surgery residents increased end-to-end anastomosis scores from 10.4 to 19.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: