Key result
ICG-FI enables quantitative assessment of microperfusion using fluorescence intensity and slope metrics.
Why the study?
Although indocyanine green fluorescent imaging (ICG-FI) is increasingly used to evaluate organ perfusion, few studies have quantitatively validated it for microperfusion assessment.
Quantitative parameters such as BSFI, SFI, and TTS can be implemented using ICG-FI to objectively assess intraoperative microperfusion.
May aid quantitative microperfusion assessment with ICG-FI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Intraoperative valuation of organ and tissue microperfusion is always a current topic in different surgical situations. Although indocyanine green fluorescent imaging (ICG-FI) has turned to be a more and more common technique to evaluate organ perfusion, only few studies tried to quantitatively validate the technique for microperfusion assessment. The aim of the following manuscript is to present the results of our interdisciplinary research confirming additional quantitative assessment tools in different surgical conditions. Thus, we are implementing the background-subtracted peak fluorescent intensity (BSFI), the slope of fluorescence intensity (SFI), and the time to slope (TTS) using ICG-FI in several regions of interest (ROI).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duprée et al. (2018) studied Surgical conditions requiring microperfusion assessment. Indocyanine green fluorescent imaging (ICG-FI) was evaluated on Quantitative assessment of microperfusion (BSFI, SFI, TTS). Indocyanine green fluorescent imaging (ICG-FI) was implemented to quantitatively assess microperfusion using background-subtracted peak fluorescent intensity, slope of fluorescence intensity, and time to slope.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: