Key result
New 1.4% Na3-citrate anticoagulant during centrifugal plateletpheresis yields no difference in platelet metabolism between fractions.
Why the study?
Previous studies reported marked platelet dysfunction in Fraction II when standard ACD-A anticoagulant was used during IFC, necessitating evaluation of a new citrate anticoagulant.
Does the use of a new 1.4% Na3-citrate anticoagulant preserve platelet metabolism across different fractions during centrifugal plateletpheresis?
Does the use of a new 1.4% Na3-citrate anticoagulant preserve platelet metabolism across different fractions during centrifugal plateletpheresis?
The use of a new 1.4% Na3-citrate anticoagulant during centrifugal plateletpheresis preserves platelet metabolism even after a second centrifugal manipulation.
Supports further testing of 1.4% Na3-citrate in plateletpheresis; leaves open effects on in vivo function and transfusion outcomes.
Employing the Haemonetics Blood Processor (IFC), a relatively pure platelet concentrate can be prepared by collecting only the first portion of the PRP leaving the centrifuge bowl (Fraction I). A subsequent fraction containing RBC and WBC contaminants (Fraction II) can be purified by means of a second centrifugation, using a conventional blood bank centrifuge (Fraction II), if transfusion of these contaminants would be detrimental to the recipient. Utilising the new 1.4% Na3-citrate anticoagulant, platelet metabolic parameters (ATP, ADP, AMP, lactate and pyruvate) as well as O2-uptake, were determined in Fraction I and II prepared from 10 normal healthy subjects. In contrast to previous studies reporting marked dysfunction in platelets contained in Fraction II when standard ACD-A was used during IFC, we observed no significant difference (Student's t test) in the present study between Fractions I and II, in regard to platelet metabolism, when using the new anticoagulant. It is further concluded that the second centrifugal manipulation does not exert a detrimental effect on platelet metabolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zítko et al. (1979) studied Healthy (n=10). 1.4% Na3-citrate anticoagulant vs. Fraction I vs Fraction II was evaluated on Platelet metabolic parameters (ATP, ADP, AMP, lactate and pyruvate) and O2-uptake. Using a new 1.4% Na3-citrate anticoagulant during centrifugal plateletpheresis resulted in no significant difference in platelet metabolism between Fraction I and Fraction II.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: