Key result
Noninvasive ClearSight System shows acceptable agreement versus invasive radial pressure with a ~4 mmHg bias.
Why the study?
The validity of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure measurement using the ClearSight System during induction of anesthesia in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery had not been evaluated.
Does noninvasive continuous arterial pressure measurement by the ClearSight System accurately reflect invasive radial arterial pressure during induction of anesthesia for cardiovascular surgery?
Population
18 patients undergoing elective cardiovascular surgery
Comparison
ClearSight System noninvasive arterial pressure vs invasive radial arterial pressure
Design
Retrospectively registered comparative validation study
Authors
Loading...
ClearSight may suffice for mean arterial pressure but not systolic or diastolic during induction; leaves open prospective validation versus invasive monitoring in cardiovascular surgery.
Observational (n=18)
No
Does noninvasive continuous arterial pressure measurement by the ClearSight System accurately reflect invasive radial arterial pressure during induction of anesthesia for cardiovascular surgery?
Mean Difference: -3.9
The ClearSight System provides acceptable accuracy for mean arterial pressure, but not systolic or diastolic pressure, compared to invasive radial arterial monitoring during anesthesia induction for cardiovascular surgery.
Tanioku et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Elective cardiovascular surgery (n=18). ClearSight System noninvasive arterial pressure measurement vs. Invasive radial arterial pressure measurement was evaluated on Bias and precision between noninvasive and invasive mean arterial pressure (bias -3.9 mmHg (precision 7.8 mmHg)). Mean arterial pressure measured by the ClearSight System showed a bias of -3.9 mmHg and precision of 7.8 mmHg compared to invasive radial arterial pressure, meeting AAMI criteria for acceptable agreement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: