Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 1, 2000Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Far‐Field QRS Complex Sensing: Prevalence and Timing with Bipolar Atrial Leads

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Decreasing atrial sensitivity to 0.5 mV or less limits far-field QRS sensing to ~20%.

  • n=30

Why the study?

Far-field QRS complex sensing through bipolar atrial leads may cause pacemaker function disturbances and affect certain pulse generator algorithms, but its prevalence and timing are not well characterized.

Population

30 patients with permanent bipolar atrial lead and DDDR pulse generator

Comparison

Different atrial amplifier sensitivity settings

Design

Observational study with intracardiac electrograms obtained by telemetry

Authors

JBJOHAN BRANDTLund UniversityWWW. WORZEWSKIBiotronik (Germany)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May warrant programming atrial sensitivity ≥0.5 mV to limit far-field sensing; hypothesis-generating for device optimization.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=30)

Structured PICO

P
Population
30 patients following implantation of a permanent bipolar atrial lead and a DDDR pulse generator.
E
Exposure
Assessment of far-field QRS complex sensing at different atrial amplifier sensitivity settings
O
Outcome
Occurrence and timing of far-field QRS complex sensingsurrogate

Far-field QRS sensing is universally present with bipolar atrial leads at high sensitivities, highlighting the importance of appropriate sensitivity settings to prevent pacemaker malfunction.

Cite This Study

BRANDT et al. (2000) conducted an observational in Patients with permanent bipolar atrial lead and DDDR pulse generator (n=30). Atrial amplifier sensitivity settings was evaluated on Occurrence and timing of far-field QRS complex sensing. Far-field QRS complex sensing via the atrial bipolar lead was universally demonstrable at maximum sensitivity (0.1 mV), but occurred in only 20% of patients at a sensitivity of 0.5 mV or less.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aaa30fc9b81d5ba47481986https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb06755.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Electrical Proarrhythmia: Induction of Inappropriate Atrial Therapies due to Far‐Field R Wave Oversensing in a New Dual Chamber Defibrillator1998 · 39 citations
  2. 2Atrio‐Ventricular and Ventriculo‐Atrial Conduction Times in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker Implant1983 · 90 citations
  3. 3Effect of Varying Atrial Sensitivity, AV Interval, and Detection Algorithm on Automatic Mode Switching1996 · 29 citations
  4. 4Sensing Characteristics of the Right Atrial Appendage Electrode1983 · 44 citations
  5. 5Prevalence and Significance of Ventriculoatrial Conduction1984 · 31 citations