Key result
Deep learning algorithm matches radiologists in ~87% of thoracic aorta measurements and halves analysis time.
Why the study?
Manual diameter measurements on ECG-gated CTA for thoracic aortic dilatation are the gold standard but are time-consuming and show high inter-reader variability.
Does a deep learning algorithm maintain accuracy and reduce measurement time compared to manual radiologist measurements for thoracic aorta diameters on ECG-gated CTA in patients with suspected aortic dilatation?
Observational (n=371)
Does a deep learning algorithm maintain accuracy and reduce measurement time compared to manual radiologist measurements for thoracic aorta diameters on ECG-gated CTA in patients with suspected aortic dilatation?
A deep learning algorithm can perform automated, guideline-compliant thoracic aorta diameter measurements on CTA with high coherence to radiologists while saving significant time.
May accelerate aortic measurements in CTA workflows; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Manually performed diameter measurements on ECG-gated CT-angiography (CTA) represent the gold standard for diagnosis of thoracic aortic dilatation. However, they are time-consuming and show high inter-reader variability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of measurements of a deep learning-(DL)-algorithm in comparison to those of radiologists and evaluated measurement times (MT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 405 ECG-gated CTA exams of 371 consecutive patients with suspected aortic dilatation between May 2010 and June 2019. The DL-algorithm prototype detected aortic landmarks (deep reinforcement learning) and segmented the lumen of the thoracic aorta (multi-layer convolutional neural network). It performed measurements according to AHA-guidelines and created visual outputs. Manual measurements were performed by radiologists using centerline technique. Human performance variability (HPV), MT and DL-performance were analyzed in a research setting using a linear mixed model based on 21 randomly selected, repeatedly measured cases. DL-algorithm results were then evaluated in a clinical setting using matched differences. If the differences were within 5 mm for all locations, the cases was regarded as coherent; if there was a discrepancy >5 mm at least at one location (incl. missing values), the case was completely reviewed. RESULTS: HPV ranged up to ±3.4 mm in repeated measurements under research conditions. In the clinical setting, 2,778/3,192 (87.0%) of DL-algorithm's measurements were coherent. Mean differences of paired measurements between DL-algorithm and radiologists at aortic sinus and ascending aorta were -0.45±5.52 and -0.02±3.36 mm. Detailed analysis revealed that measurements at the aortic root were over-/underestimated due to a tilted measurement plane. In total, calculated time saved by DL-algorithm was 3:10 minutes/case. CONCLUSIONS: The DL-algorithm provided coherent results to radiologists at almost 90% of measurement locations, while the majority of discrepent cases were located at the aortic root. In summary, the DL-algorithm assisted radiologists in performing AHA-compliant measurements by saving 50% of time per case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pradella et al. (2021) conducted an observational in suspected aortic dilatation (n=371). Deep learning algorithm vs. Manual measurements by radiologists was evaluated on Coherence of measurements (difference within 5 mm) between DL-algorithm and radiologists. A deep learning algorithm provided coherent thoracic aorta diameter measurements compared to radiologists in 87.0% of locations and saved 50% of measurement time per case.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: