Key result
Concomitant significant MR and AR post-TAVI linked to ~220% higher mortality, unlike isolated regurgitation.
Why the study?
The impact of postprocedural mitral regurgitation and its interaction with aortic regurgitation on mortality after TAVI was unclear.
Does the presence of significant postprocedural mitral and/or aortic regurgitation increase mortality in patients following TAVI?
Cohort (n=381)
Yes
Does the presence of significant postprocedural mitral and/or aortic regurgitation increase mortality in patients following TAVI?
Odds Ratio: 3.2 (95% CI 1.54–5.71)
p-value: p=0.002
Concomitant significant mitral and aortic regurgitation following TAVI significantly increases mortality, whereas isolated MR or AR does not.
May identify high-risk TAVI patients for closer surveillance; leaves open whether dual-valve intervention alters prognosis.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the impact of postprocedural mitral regurgitation (MR), in an interaction with aortic regurgitation (AR), on mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: To assess the interaction between MR and AR, we compared the survival rate of patients (i) without both significant MR and AR versus (ii) those with either significant MR or significant AR versus (iii) with significant MR and AR, all postprocedure. 381 participants of the Polish Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Registry (166 males (43.6%) and 215 females (56.4%), age 78.8±7.4 years) were analysed. Follow-up was 94.1±96.5 days. RESULTS: In-hospital and midterm mortality were 6.6% and 10.2%, respectively. Significant MR and AR were present in 16% and 8.1% patients, including 3.1% patients with both significant MR and AR. Patients with significant versus insignificant AR differed with respect to mortality (log rank p=0.009). This difference was not apparent in a subgroup of patients without significant MR (log rank p=0.80). In a subgroup of patients without significant AR, there were no significant differences in mortality between individuals with versus without significant MR (log rank p=0.44). Significant MR and AR had a significant impact on mortality only when associated with each other (log rank p<0.0001). At multivariate Cox regression modelling concomitant significant MR and AR were independently associated with mortality (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.54 to 5.71, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Significant MR or AR postprocedure, when isolated, had no impact on survival. Combined MR and AR had a significant impact on a patient's prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szymański et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=381). Concomitant significant mitral and aortic regurgitation vs. Isolated significant MR, isolated significant AR, or neither was evaluated on Mortality (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.54 to 5.71, p=0.002). Concomitant significant mitral and aortic regurgitation following TAVI was independently associated with increased mortality (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.54-5.71; p=0.002), unlike isolated MR or AR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: