Key result
One anastomosis gastric bypass shows ~78% excess weight loss at 60 months, beating RYGB and LSG.
Why the study?
Long-term results after bariatric surgery and repetitive weight fluctuations remain unclear, with potential for unsuccessful weight loss, plateaus, and weight regain.
How do different types of bariatric surgery (LSG, RYGB, OAGB) compare in terms of long-term weight loss and weight regain over 5 years in morbidly obese patients?
Population
2567 morbidly obese participants at a specialized obesity clinic
Comparison
LSG vs RYGB vs OAGB
Design
Retrospective cohort study
Follow-up
Up to five years
Authors
Loading...
May support OAGB preference in observational cohorts; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm durability and safety.
Cohort (n=2,567)
No
How do different types of bariatric surgery (LSG, RYGB, OAGB) compare in terms of long-term weight loss and weight regain over 5 years in morbidly obese patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 77.6% vs 65.55%
p-value: p=<0.001
OAGB provides the fastest and highest percentage of excess weight loss compared to RYGB and LSG, with LSG showing the earliest and most significant weight regain over 5 years.
Hatami et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Morbid obesity (n=2,567). One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) was evaluated on Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 60 months (p=<0.001). One anastomosis gastric bypass provided the highest percentage of excess weight loss at 60 months (77.6%) compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (65.6%) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (57.1%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: