Key result
Bipolar RF ablation achieves a ~21-fold higher rate of in vitro transmurality versus unipolar ablation.
Why the study?
Bipolar radiofrequency ablation creates transmurality more often than unipolar ablation, but optimal radiofrequency settings remain poorly understood.
Does bipolar radiofrequency ablation improve lesion transmurality compared to unipolar ablation in an in vitro model?
Does bipolar radiofrequency ablation improve lesion transmurality compared to unipolar ablation in an in vitro model?
Absolute Event Rate: 42% vs 2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Bipolar radiofrequency ablation is significantly more effective than unipolar ablation at creating transmural lesions in vitro, with optimal results achieved using longer duration, higher tip load, and a larger indifferent electrode.
Bipolar ablation may improve in vitro transmurality; leaves open translation to clinical arrhythmia ablation.
BackgroundThe main determinant of the radiofrequency (RF) ablation effect is transmurality of the lesion.Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (BA) creates transmurality in a higher proportion of cases than unipolar ablation (UA), but little is known about optimal RF settings. Material and methodsThis study aimed to compare UA and BA based on different application time, cathode tip load, anode size and power settings for achieving a transmural lesion in vitro.A Thermocool electrode was used for ablation (cathode) and a 4 mm or 8 mm tip catheter was used as the ground electrode (anode) for BA.The tested settings were tip load (10 g and 20 g), power (30 W or 40 W), and application duration (30, 60, or 90 s).After ablation, we measured scar size and transmurality of the lesion. ResultsBA created significantly larger and deeper scars compared with UA.Transmurality was achieved respectively in 42% and 2% of cases (p<0.001).Higher tip load resulted in larger scar size, and transmurality was achieved in 37% and 20% of cases (p=0.05).Scar size and transmurality increased with RF duration (5%, 39% and 42% of specimens, respectively (p<0.001).Bigger tip size of the ground electrode was related to higher transmurality (22% vs 61%, p<0.001).No relationship was found between power and transmurality.Optimal parameter settings were 20 g tip load, indifferent electrode with 8 mm tip, and 90 s RF duration (97.6% transmurality). ConclusionsBA is more effective than UA in achieving transmural lesions.Optimal settings for BA consist of longer RF duration, higher tip load, and bigger tip size of the indifferent electrode.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baszko et al. (2019) studied this question. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation vs. Unipolar ablation was evaluated on Transmurality of the lesion (p=<0.001). Bipolar radiofrequency ablation achieved transmurality in a significantly higher proportion of in vitro cases compared with unipolar ablation (42% vs 2%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: