Key result
Small aortic annuli carry no worse 7-year prognosis after TAVI compared to large annuli.
Why the study?
Evidence regarding the long-term outcomes and durability of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves after TAVI is still scarce.
Does small aortic annulus size worsen long-term mortality and bioprosthetic valve failure compared to large aortic annulus in patients undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves?
Cohort (n=2,700)
Does small aortic annulus size worsen long-term mortality and bioprosthetic valve failure compared to large aortic annulus in patients undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves?
Hazard Ratio: 1.07 (95% CI 0.85–1.36)
Absolute Event Rate: 55.2% vs 58.6%
p-value: p=0.56
Annular size does not significantly impact 7-year mortality or bioprosthetic valve failure in patients receiving balloon-expandable TAVI.
Should not alter TAVI selection by annular size; leaves open randomized confirmation of long-term valve durability.
BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the long-term outcomes and durability of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (BE-THVs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still scarce. AIMS: This study evaluates these outcomes and further examines their association with the annular size in patients. METHODS: ; any larger annuli were labelled large aortic annuli (LAA). The primary endpoints were the incidence of all-cause mortality and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) between the SAA and LAA groups. As a subanalysis, the primary endpoints were examined in relation to postprocedural mean pressure gradient (mPG) ≥20 mmHg, severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), and sex differences, comparing SAA and LAA each time. RESULTS: Overall, 66.4% (n=1,793) of patients were categorised into the SAA group. At 7 years after TAVI, the cumulative all-cause mortality showed differences between the SAA and LAA groups (55.2% vs 58.6%), while BVF assessed by Gray's test was similar between the groups (3.3% vs 2.7%). The Cox multivariable analysis revealed no association between SAA and worse prognosis (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-1.36; p=0.56). There were no significant differences in mortality or BVF regarding an mPG ≥20 mmHg, severe PPM, or sex between the SAA and LAA groups (allp>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Annular size differences were not found to influence long-term outcomes or valve durability following TAVI with a BE-THV, suggesting that other factors warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamamoto et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (n=2,700). Small aortic annuli (SAA) vs. Large aortic annuli (LAA) was evaluated on All-cause mortality and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.85-1.36, p=0.56). Small aortic annuli were not associated with worse prognosis compared to large annuli at 7 years after TAVI (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.85-1.36; p=0.56).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: