Key result
Small annuli yield similar 5-year major event rates as large annuli after TAVR.
Why the study?
The longer term impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch and mean gradient after TAVR in patients with small versus large annuli remains controversial.
Does TAVR with balloon-expandable valves in small annuli result in similar long-term clinical outcomes compared to large annuli?
Observational
Does TAVR with balloon-expandable valves in small annuli result in similar long-term clinical outcomes compared to large annuli?
Five-year clinical outcomes after TAVR with balloon-expandable valves are comparable between patients with small and large aortic annuli, regardless of prosthesis-patient mismatch or 30-day mean gradient.
Supports use of balloon-expandable valves in small annuli; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Short-term clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are similar in individuals with small or large annuli. The longer term impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and mean gradient (MG) post-TAVR in these patients remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate 5-year outcomes in patients with small vs large annuli. METHODS: ) annular size. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke, or heart failure hospitalization. In addition, the relationships between both PPM and post-TAVR MG and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Patients with small annuli were older (age 79.6 ± 7.1 years vs 78.7 ± 7.8 years; P = 0.047), were more often female (75.0% vs 16.2%; P < 0.0001), had higher baseline Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores (4.3% ± 1.93% vs 4.0% ± 1.93%; P < 0.0001), and had higher left ventricular ejection fractions (66.3% ± 15.82% vs 59.7% ± 13.68%; P < 0.0001). Primary endpoint rates were similar at 1 year (7.8% vs 8.0%; P = 0.94) and 5 years (36.3% vs 35.8%; P = 0.83). Bioprosthetic valve failure was infrequent at 5 years in both groups (2.9% vs 2.1%; P = 0.46). Among female patients, outcomes were similar for small vs large annuli (primary endpoint; 33.6% vs 34.2%; P = 0.90). Among patients with small annuli, there was no association between 5-year outcomes and any severity of PPM (P = 0.22) or 30-day MG (P for nonlinearity = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Five-year clinical outcomes were excellent and comparable between patients with small vs large aortic annuli. Outcomes in patients with small annuli were not affected by 30-day MG or PPM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hahn et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Small annuli vs. Large annuli was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke, or heart failure hospitalization (p=0.83). Patients with small aortic annuli undergoing TAVR had similar 5-year rates of death, disabling stroke, or heart failure hospitalization compared to those with large annuli (36.3% vs 35.8%; P=0.83).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: