Key result
Surgical pulmonary embolectomy for massive PE carries ~43% in-hospital mortality, driven primarily by salvage cases.
Why the study?
There is no consensus on the management of acute severe pulmonary embolism despite efforts to improve outcomes.
What are the outcomes of early versus salvage surgical pulmonary embolectomy in patients with massive pulmonary embolism?
Population
16 consecutive patients with massive acute pulmonary embolism, mean age 45 +/- 17 years, 56% male
Comparison
Urgent/emergent surgical pulmonary embolectomy vs salvage surgical pulmonary embolectomy
Design
Observational case series
Follow-up
Mean 48 +/- 38 months
Authors
Loading...
Early embolectomy may benefit stable PE with RV dysfunction; leaves open need for RCTs versus medical therapy.
Observational (n=16)
No
What are the outcomes of early versus salvage surgical pulmonary embolectomy in patients with massive pulmonary embolism?
Surgical pulmonary embolectomy has favorable outcomes when performed early in patients with RV dysfunction, but dismal results in salvage situations.
Carvalho et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Acute severe pulmonary embolism (n=16). Surgical pulmonary embolectomy was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. Surgical pulmonary embolectomy for massive pulmonary embolism had an overall in-hospital mortality of 43%, with 11% mortality in emergent cases and 85% in salvage operations.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: