Key result
Echocardiography identifies systolic dysfunction in ~27% of syncope patients with abnormal ECGs or cardiac history.
Why the study?
The role of echocardiography in the stepwise evaluation of syncope, particularly in patients with suspected obstructive valvar lesions or unexplained syncope, was unclear.
Does bidimensional Doppler transthoracic echocardiography improve diagnostic yield in patients with syncope?
Observational (n=650)
No
Does bidimensional Doppler transthoracic echocardiography improve diagnostic yield in patients with syncope?
Routine echocardiography has low diagnostic yield for unexplained syncope in patients with a normal ECG and negative cardiac history, but is valuable for risk stratification in those with abnormal baseline cardiac evaluations.
Selective echocardiography may be considered in unexplained syncope with cardiac history or abnormal ECG; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
OBJECTIVE: To study the role of echocardiography in the stepwise evaluation of syncope. DESIGN: A prospective observational study with an 18 month follow up. SETTING: University teaching hospital providing primary and tertiary care. SUBJECTS: 650 consecutive patients with syncope and clinical suspicion of an obstructive valvar lesion, or with syncope not explained by history, physical examination, or a 12 lead ECG, who underwent bidimensional Doppler transthoracic echocardiography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The causes of syncope were assigned using published diagnostic criteria. Echocardiography was considered diagnostic when confirming a suspected diagnosis, or when revealing occult cardiac disease explaining the syncope. RESULTS: A systolic murmur was identified in 61 of the 650 patients (9%). Severe aortic stenosis was suspected in 20 of these and was confirmed by echocardiography in eight. Follow up excluded further cases of aortic stenosis. In patients with unexplained syncope (n = 155), routine echocardiography showed no abnormalities that established the cause of the syncope. Echocardiography was normal or non-relevant in all patients with a negative cardiac history and a normal ECG (n = 67). In patients with a positive cardiac history or an abnormal ECG (n = 88), echocardiography showed systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%) in 24 (27%) and minor non-relevant findings in the remaining 64. Arrhythmias were diagnosed in 12 of the 24 patients with systolic dysfunction (50%), and in 12 of the 64 remaining patients (19%) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography was most useful for assessing the severity of the underlying cardiac disease and for risk stratification in patients with unexplained syncope but with a positive cardiac history or an abnormal ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
François Sarasin (2002) conducted an observational in Syncope (n=650). Echocardiography was evaluated on Diagnostic yield of echocardiography for the cause of syncope. Echocardiography identified systolic dysfunction in 27% of unexplained syncope patients with a positive cardiac history or abnormal ECG, but yielded no relevant findings in those without these.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: