Key result
Echo-defined cardiac damage classes in severe AS correlate with abnormal preprocedural biomarkers and invasive hemodynamics.
Why the study?
Echocardiographically defined cardiac damage classes have been proposed to guide stratification and treatment in AS, but their correlation with biomarkers and invasive hemodynamic measures needed evaluation.
Do echocardiographically defined cardiac damage classes correlate with biomarkers and invasive hemodynamic measures in patients with symptomatic severe AS referred for TAVR?
Cross-Sectional (n=44)
Do echocardiographically defined cardiac damage classes correlate with biomarkers and invasive hemodynamic measures in patients with symptomatic severe AS referred for TAVR?
Echocardiographic cardiac damage classification in severe AS correlates with biomarker and invasive hemodynamic abnormalities, providing physiologic support for its use in patient stratification.
Cardiac damage staging correlates with biomarkers and invasive hemodynamics in severe AS; supports staging validity but leaves open prospective outcome trials before clinical adoption.
Background: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) results in significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. To guide patient stratification and treatment in AS, echocardiographically defined cardiac damage classes have been proposed. This prospective cross-sectional study hypothesized that these classes would correlate with biomarkers and invasive hemodynamic measures of cardiovascular dysfunction.Methods: 44 patients with symptomatic severe AS referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) were assigned damage classes (0–4) echocardiographically. 14 patients were assigned classes 0–1; 24 class 2; and 6 classes 3–4. Immediately before TAVR, serum biomarker levels were measured, and invasive right and left heart catheterization performed.Results: Preprocedural biomarkers were progressively more abnormal with increasing damage class, including overall number abnormal (rs = 0.34, p = 0.02); high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (rs = 0.25, p = 0.10); NT-proBNP (rs = 0.33, p = 0.03); and soluble ST2 (rs = 0.35, p = 0.02). Further, damage classes correlated with preprocedural invasive hemodynamic measures, including pulmonary artery compliance (rs = −0.29, p = 0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance (rs = 0.32, p = 0.04), and stroke volume index (rs = −0.31, p = 0.04). Increasing damage class was associated with greater likelihood of low-flow states.Conclusions: Noninvasive classification of cardiac damage in AS correlates with several biomarkers and invasive hemodynamic measures of AS severity and cardiovascular dysfunction. These data provide physiologic and biochemical support to this classification, suggest that higher classes of cardiac damage reflect grades of accumulating cardiovascular dysfunction, and may enable more refined periprocedural patient selection and stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lloyd et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic valve stenosis (n=44). Echocardiographically defined cardiac damage classes was evaluated on Correlation with biomarkers and invasive hemodynamic measures (rs = 0.34, p=0.02). Echocardiographically defined cardiac damage classes in severe aortic stenosis correlated with abnormal preprocedural biomarkers (overall number abnormal rs=0.34, p=0.02) and hemodynamic measures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: