Key result
Elevated NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, and ST2 are linked to ~19-fold more recurrent HF hospitalizations.
Why the study?
Despite advances in therapy, heart failure patients continue to have significant rehospitalization rates and risk prediction remains challenging.
Does a multi-biomarker panel (NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, ST2) improve prediction of recurrent hospitalizations in ambulatory heart failure patients?
Cohort (n=891)
No
Does a multi-biomarker panel (NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, ST2) improve prediction of recurrent hospitalizations in ambulatory heart failure patients?
Relative Risk: 18.8 (95% CI 7.88–44.84)
Absolute Event Rate: 31% vs 1%
p-value: p=<0.001
A multi-biomarker panel including NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, and ST2 improves the long-term prediction of recurrent hospitalizations in ambulatory heart failure patients compared to clinical assessment alone.
May enhance recurrent HF hospitalization prediction beyond clinical assessment; leaves open impact on management or outcomes.
Background: Despite advances in pharmacologic therapy and devices, patients with heart failure (HF) continue to have significant rehospitalization rates and risk prediction remains challenging. We sought to explore the value of a multi-biomarker panel (including NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, and ST2) on top of clinical assessment for long-term prediction of recurrent hospitalizations in HF. Methods and Results: NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, and ST2 levels were measured in 891 consecutive ambulatory HF patients. The independent association between the multi-biomarker panel and recurrent hospitalizations was assessed through a multivariable negative binomial regression and expressed as incidence rates ratios. McFadden pseudoR2 and goodness-of-fit measures were also used. The total number of unplanned hospitalizations (all-cause, cardiovascular [CV]-, and HF-related) were selected as the primary endpoints. At a mean follow-up of 4.2±2.1 years, 1623 all-cause hospitalizations in 498 patients (55.9%), 710 CV-related hospitalizations in 331 patients (37.2%), and 444 HF-related hospitalizations in 214 patients (24.1%) were registered. The crude incidence of all-cause, CV-, and HF-related recurrent hospitalizations was significantly higher for patients with the multi-biomarker panel above the cut-point (hs-TnT>14 ng/L, NT-proBNP>1000 ng/L, and ST2>35 ng/mL) (all P<0.001). For all-cause, CV-, and HF-related recurrent hospitalizations, the McFadden R2, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion supported the superiority of incorporating the multi-biomarker panel into a clinical predictive model. Conclusions: A multi-biomarker approach that incorporates NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, and ST2 better identifies HF patients at risk for recurrent hospitalizations. Elucidation of new biophysiological targets for recurrent hospitalizations may identify patient profiles for focused intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bayés‐Genís et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=891). Multi-biomarker panel (NT-proBNP > 1000 ng/L, hs-TnT > 14 ng/L, ST2 > 35 ng/mL) vs. None of the biomarkers elevated was evaluated on Total number of unplanned HF-related hospitalizations (IRR 18.80, 95% CI 7.88-44.84, p=<0.001). Having three elevated biomarkers (NT-proBNP, hs-TnT, and ST2) was associated with an 18.8-fold increased risk of recurrent heart failure hospitalizations compared to having no elevated biomarkers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: