Key result
Exercise increases EOA in Avalus bioprosthetic valves, reducing severe PPM by ~100%.
Why the study?
Despite high rates of patient–prosthesis mismatch after SAVR with the Avalus bioprosthetic valve, excellent midterm clinical outcomes have been reported, motivating assessment of valve haemodynamics during exercise.
Does exercise echocardiography demonstrate an opening reserve that explains the high rates of resting patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients with the Avalus bioprosthetic valve?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
No
Does exercise echocardiography demonstrate an opening reserve that explains the high rates of resting patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients with the Avalus bioprosthetic valve?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exercise echocardiography reveals a significant opening reserve in the Avalus bioprosthetic valve, resolving the discrepancy between high resting patient-prosthesis mismatch rates and favorable clinical outcomes.
Objectives Despite unusual high rates of patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM), excellent midterm clinical outcomes have been reported after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with the Avalus™ bioprosthetic valve (Medtronic). To elucidate this “PPM conundrum,” the Avalus valve haemodynamics were assessed during exercise testing. Methods Of the 148 patients who had undergone SAVR with the Avalus valve at our institution, 30 were randomly selected among those in whom stress test was deemed feasible and underwent a resting transthoracic echocardiography immediately followed by exercise echocardiography. Severe PPM was defined as indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) 0.65 cm2/m2 and moderate PPM as iEOA 0.65 and 0.85 cm2/m2. Measured PPM was determined with the use of the measured iEOA at rest or stress, while the estimated PPM was based on the estimated iEOA, derived from the mean EOA reported for each valve size in the manufacturer chart. Results Measured EOA significantly increased from rest to peak exercise in all PPM groups (p < .05) and the rates of moderate and severe measured PPM decreased from 40% and 20% to 27% and 0%, respectively. The patients with low-flow state (flow < 250 ml/s) had significantly lower measured rest EOA (p = .03). On the basis of the estimated iEOA, there was no severe PPM and 19 patients had moderate PPM (63.3%), with a significantly lower opening reserve than the patients without estimated PPM (p = .04). The estimated iEOA was more reliably correlated to the measured iEOA at maximal stress than the measured iEOA at rest, especially in patients with a low-flow state. Conclusions This study supports the concept of an opening reserve of the Avalus valve to explain the PPM conundrum and promotes the use of exercise Doppler-echocardiography to complete the assessment of mismatch, especially in patients with a low-flow state. Published estimated EOA seems reliable to predict the haemodynamic performance of the Avalus valve, whether the flow conditions at rest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porterie et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Surgical aortic valve replacement with Avalus bioprosthetic valve (n=30). Exercise testing vs. Rest was evaluated on Measured effective orifice area (EOA) and rates of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) (p=< .05). Exercise echocardiography in patients with an Avalus bioprosthetic valve demonstrated a significant increase in effective orifice area, reducing severe patient-prosthesis mismatch from 20% to 0%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: