Key result
Trifecta bioprosthesis is linked to ~4 mmHg lower resting mean gradients versus Perimount Magna Ease.
Why the study?
Does the Trifecta bioprosthesis improve rest and exercise haemodynamics compared to the Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis in patients with small aortic annuli?
Population
35 patients with Trifecta, 16 with PME bioprostheses, and 25 healthy controls with small aortic annuli
Comparison
Trifecta bioprosthesis vs Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis vs healthy controls
Design
Observational study using transthoracic echocardiography during rest and exercise
Follow-up
1 year for Trifecta, 2.6 years for PME
Authors
Loading...
Does not support changing valve selection; leaves open whether hemodynamic gains improve clinical outcomes in randomized data.
Observational (n=76)
Does the Trifecta bioprosthesis improve rest and exercise haemodynamics compared to the Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis in patients with small aortic annuli?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.96% vs 12.19%
The Trifecta bioprosthesis demonstrates superior haemodynamic performance at rest and during exercise compared to the Perimount Magna Ease in patients with small aortic annuli.
Stock et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with small aortic annuli (n=76). Trifecta bioprosthesis vs. Perimount Magna Ease (PME) bioprosthesis was evaluated on Mean transvalvular gradient at rest (mmHg). The Trifecta bioprosthesis demonstrated significant haemodynamic superiority over the Perimount Magna Ease, with lower mean transvalvular gradients at rest (7.96 vs 12.19 mmHg) and during exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: