Key result
The Avalus stented aortic valve bioprosthesis demonstrated linearized adverse event rates below 2x objective performance criteria for death, thromboembolism, thrombosis, PVL, and endocarditis.
Why the study?
Does a new bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis (Avalus) provide acceptable safety and haemodynamic performance compared to objective performance criteria in patients with symptomatic moderate/severe aortic stenosis or chronic severe aortic regurgitation?
Does a new bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis (Avalus) provide acceptable safety and haemodynamic performance compared to objective performance criteria in patients with symptomatic moderate/severe aortic stenosis or chronic severe aortic regurgitation?
The Avalus stented aortic valve bioprosthesis demonstrated good safety and haemodynamic performance at 1 year, though bleeding rates exceeded objective performance criteria.
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports safety of Avalus bioprosthesis in aortic valve disease; leaves open comparative efficacy versus other valves in randomized trials.
Klautz et al. (2017) studied Symptomatic moderate or severe aortic stenosis or chronic, severe aortic regurgitation (n=686). Avalus bovine stented aortic valve bioprosthesis vs. Objective performance criteria (OPC) was evaluated on Late (>30 days post-implant) linearized rates of valve-related thromboembolism, thrombosis, all and major haemorrhage, all and major paravalvular leak (PVL) and endocarditis. The Avalus stented aortic valve bioprosthesis demonstrated linearized adverse event rates below 2x objective performance criteria for death, thromboembolism, thrombosis, PVL, and endocarditis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: