Key result
Capsule endoscopy yields 0 adverse events and preserves device parameters in pacemaker or ICD patients.
Why the study?
The potential for electromagnetic interference between cardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators and small bowel capsule endoscopy devices was uncertain.
Does small bowel capsule endoscopy cause clinically important electromagnetic interference or adverse events in patients with cardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Observational (n=20)
Does small bowel capsule endoscopy cause clinically important electromagnetic interference or adverse events in patients with cardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators?
Small bowel capsule endoscopy appears safe in patients with cardiac pacemakers and ICDs, with no clinically important electromagnetic interference or loss of transmitted images observed.
Hypothesis-generating for capsule endoscopy safety with pacemakers/ICDs; larger prospective studies needed before practice change.
AIM: To determine if there were any interactions between cardiac devices and small bowel capsules secondary to electromagnetic interference (EMI) in patients who have undergone small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). METHODS: Authors conducted a chart review of 20 patients with a cardiac pacemaker (CP) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who underwent continuous electrocardiographic monitoring during their SBCE from 2003-2008. authors searched for unexplained electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, changes in CP and ICD set parameters, any abnormality in transmitted capsule data, and adverse clinical events. RESULTS: There were no adverse events or hemodynamically significant arrhythmias reported. CP and ICD set parameters were preserved. The majority of ECG abnormalities were also found in pre- or post- SBCE ECG tracings and the CP behavior during arrhythmias appeared appropriate. Two patients seemed to have episodes of undersensing by the CP. However, similar findings were documented in ECGs taken outside the time frame of the SBCE. One patient was observed to have a low signal encountered from the capsule resulting in lack of localization, but no images were lost. CONCLUSION: Capsule-induced EMI remains a possibility but is unlikely to be clinically important. CP-induced interference of SBCE is also possible, but is infrequent and does not result in loss of images transmitted by the capsule.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Justin Cuschieri (2012) conducted an observational in Patients with a cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator undergoing small bowel capsule endoscopy (n=20). Small bowel capsule endoscopy was evaluated on Adverse clinical events or hemodynamically significant arrhythmias. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with cardiac pacemakers or ICDs resulted in 0 adverse clinical events or hemodynamically significant arrhythmias, with preserved device parameters.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: