Why the study?
The safety and effectiveness of supervised exercise training in cardiac rehabilitation for patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) required assessment.
Does supervised exercise training in cardiac rehabilitation safely improve exercise capacity in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators compared to matched patients without ICDs?
Cohort (n=84)
Does supervised exercise training in cardiac rehabilitation safely improve exercise capacity in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators compared to matched patients without ICDs?
Supervised exercise training in cardiac rehabilitation appears safe and effective for patients with ICDs, yielding similar improvements in exercise capacity as seen in patients without ICDs.
Cardiac rehabilitation appears feasible for ICD patients; leaves open need for prospective trials to confirm safety.
In Brief PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and adverse events among patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) in cardiac rehabilitation programs. METHODS Data were compared for 42 consecutive patients with ICDs and 42 control patients matched by age, gender, and left ventricular ejection fraction without ICDs and enrolled in the same program. RESULTS The number of cardiac rehabilitation exercise sessions for each group was 828 and 925, respectively. Only 1 patient experienced an ICD firing during exercise; there were no cardiac arrests and no deaths in either group. Compliance with cardiac rehabilitation was similar in both groups with most dropouts for nonmedical reasons and similar rates for cardiac-related reasons. Improvements in exercise capacity were similar between groups (30% in ICD patients and 37% in controls). CONCLUSIONS Although larger studies are needed, these data suggest that supervised exercise training in patients with ICDs appears to be safe and effective. Clinical outcomes and adverse events among patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) in cardiac rehabilitation programs were compared with matched patients without ICDs. One patient experienced ICD firing during exercise, no cardiac arrests or deaths occurred in either group, and compliance and improvement in exercise capacity between groups were similar.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Patients in cardiac rehabilitation programs (n=84). Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) vs. Matched patients without ICDs was evaluated on Clinical outcomes and adverse events (including cardiac arrests, deaths, and exercise capacity).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: