Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ninety 4-year-olds took part in this experiment. Children heard a novel word ( e.g., X) uttered in an ambiguous sentence frame (e.g., This Y is X, where Y was a basic-level count noun, such as dog) and applied to either 1 or 2 drawings of familiar animals. This word could be construed either as a proper name (e.g., This dog is Fred) or as an adjective (e.g., This dog is red). Children were more likely to interpret the word as a proper name ( and less likely to interpret it as an adjective ) if it was applied to I than if it was applied to 2 objects. Children thus made a default assumption that, in order to be a proper name, a word should be applied to only I individual. However, children overrode this default assumption if sufficient contextual information (from additional syntactic cues) indicated that they should do so.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. Geoffrey Hall (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: