Key result
Freedom SOLO AVR linked to a ~39 mmHg reduction in mean transvalvular gradient at 1-3 months.
Why the study?
Early clinical and haemodynamic results with the Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement were investigated to assess its performance and impact on left ventricular regression.
Does aortic valve replacement with the Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis improve haemodynamic performance and left ventricular mass index in patients requiring AVR?
Observational (n=229)
Yes
Does aortic valve replacement with the Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis improve haemodynamic performance and left ventricular mass index in patients requiring AVR?
p-value: p=<0.0001
The Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis provides excellent early hemodynamic performance and rapid left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement.
FSB yielded favourable early haemodynamics after AVR in this cohort; leaves open long-term durability and comparative efficacy.
OBJECTIVES: The present study investigates early clinical and haemodynamic results with the Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis (FSB) for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in eight Italian institutions. METHODS: From 2004 to 2008, a total of 229 patients [139 females (60.7%); mean age 74 ± 8 years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction >40%] underwent AVR with FSB. One hundred and four patients underwent preoperatively, at 1-3 and at 12 months after AVR resting transthoracic echocardiography with the effective orifice area index (EOAi) assessment, peak and mean transvalvular pressure gradients and the LV mass index (LVMi) measurement. A subset of 34 patients underwent exercise stress echocardiography at a mean of 9.6 months after AVR. RESULTS: Post-operative mortality was 3.1%. At 1-3 months, FSB showed a significant increase in the EOAi (0.39 ± 0.17 to 1.04 ± 0.17 cm(2)/m(2); P < 0.0001), a reduction in the mean gradient (43.2 ± 16.9 to 4.3 ± 2.3 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and a significant regression of the LVMi (147.6 ± 30.5 to 121.6 ± 27.4 g/m(2); P < 0.0001). During exercise stress echocardiography, the mean aortic gradients increased from 4.4 ± 1.7 at rest to 7.0 ± 2.7 mmHg at peak stress (P < 0.001). The EOA increased from 1.74 ± 0.33 to 1.80 ± 0.36 cm(2) (P = 0.0291). Mean gradients at peak stress had better correlation with resting EOAi (r = -0.74; P < 0.001) than with the prosthesis size (r = 0.43; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The supra-annular implantation of FSB offers excellent haemodynamic performance both at rest and during exercise and is associated with the rapid regression of the LV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Repossini et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Aortic valve disease requiring replacement (n=229). Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis was evaluated on Haemodynamic performance (effective orifice area index, mean gradient, and left ventricular mass index) (p=<0.0001). Aortic valve replacement with the Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis significantly reduced the mean transvalvular gradient from 43.2 to 4.3 mmHg (P<0.0001) at 1-3 months.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: