Validation study demonstrates improved diagnostic agreement with AI-assisted bone marrow fibrosis assessment in biopsy samples, indicating a path toward standardized haematopathology.
Assessment of fibrosis is central to the evaluation of diagnostic bone marrow trephine (BMT) biopsies. However, manual fibrosis grading is subjective and only semi-quantitative. We evaluated the clinical utility of a previously developed AI-based quantitative fibrosis assessment tool, Continuous Indexing of Fibrosis (CIF), using ~1000 consecutive BMT biopsies without pre-selection. An international panel of 14 haematopathologists performed manual reads using whole-slide images (WSI) of reticulin-stained slides and two types of CIF-assisted reads ( Sequential-assisted and Concurrent-assisted ) across three study rounds. The AI-derived CIF scores correlated strongly with the manual consensus MF grade (Spearman ρ = 0.770) and demonstrated good discriminative performance across adjacent MF grade boundaries. The CIF-assisted protocols significantly improved intra-observer and inter-observer agreement compared to manual assessment, without increasing read times. Sequential-assisted reads yielded the largest gain in inter-observer agreement (12.6 percentage points; 95% CI 10.5–14.8) and improved agreement with the consensus reference (3.0 percentage points; 95% CI 0.4–5.7). Both assisted protocols reduced discordance across the clinically significant MF-1 / MF-2 boundary. These findings demonstrate that AI-assisted quantitative bone marrow fibrosis assessment using CIF is reproducible, efficient and well suited for future clinical deployment testing. This supports a future role in standardising routine diagnostic haematopathology and enhancing the sensitivity of fibrosis-based clinical trial endpoints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruane et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: