Key result
PEF1 phenogroup linked to ~127% higher risk of adverse outcomes versus PEF2.
Why the study?
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is clinically heterogeneous and poorly defined, complicating identification of biologically distinct subgroups and risk stratification.
Does multimodal data-driven clustering identify biologically distinct and prognostically relevant subgroups in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=155)
Yes
Does multimodal data-driven clustering identify biologically distinct and prognostically relevant subgroups in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Hazard Ratio: 2.27 (95% CI 1.04–4.94)
p-value: p=0.039
Integrating high-throughput proteomics with machine learning identifies two biologically distinct HFpEF subtypes, including a high-risk inflammatory cardiorenal phenotype, enabling better risk stratification.
PEF1 identifies higher-risk HFpEF; extends proteomic phenotyping but remains hypothesis-generating pending trials.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over half of heart failure cases but remains poorly defined due to its clinical heterogeneity. In the prospective PACIFIC-Preserved cohort (NCT04189029, n = 155), we applied multimodal deep phenotyping, including high-throughput proteomics, and unsupervised machine learning to identify biologically distinct HFpEF subgroups. Multiview clustering revealed two major HFpEF phenogroups: PEF1, characterized by inflammatory signaling, TNF receptor activation, cardio-skeletal injury, and greater renal dysfunction; and PEF2, marked by endothelial stress and milder perturbations. Conventional diagnostics alone could not reliably distinguish these subgroups, but a multimodal classifier integrating clinical, imaging, and proteomic variables achieved high predictive accuracy (F1-score 0.87). External validation in the MEDIA-DHF cohort (n = 456) confirmed that PEF1 was independently associated with adverse outcomes (adjusted HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.04–4.94). These findings establish a classifier-driven, biologically informed stratification of HFpEF, providing a framework for precision medicine in heart failure. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is clinically heterogeneous, complicating efforts to identify patients at highest risk. Here, the authors show that integrating proteomics with machine learning reveals two biologically distinct subtypes with different prognoses, including a high-risk inflammatory cardiorenal phenotype.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hulot et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=155). PEF1 phenogroup vs. PEF2 phenogroup was evaluated on Composite of death, cardiovascular or HF-related hospitalizations (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.04-4.94, p=0.039). The PEF1 phenogroup was independently associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to the PEF2 phenogroup (adjusted HR 2.27).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: