Key result
ARFI imaging reliably measures renal stiffness with a ~4% technical failure rate in native kidneys.
Why the study?
The technical performance of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for measuring renal parenchymal stiffness has not been systematically estimated.
Does acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging provide reliable technical performance for measuring renal parenchymal stiffness in patients with native or transplanted kidneys?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,993)
Does acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging provide reliable technical performance for measuring renal parenchymal stiffness in patients with native or transplanted kidneys?
ARFI-based SWE techniques demonstrate good technical performance and reliability for measuring renal parenchymal stiffness, though standardized guidelines are needed.
Supports reliable ARFI use for renal stiffness assessment in native and transplanted kidneys; extends technical evidence but requires standardized guidelines.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the technical performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging (two-dimensional shear wave elastography [2D-SWE] and point shear wave elastography [p-SWE]) for measuring renal parenchymal stiffness. METHODS: EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched for studies reporting technical performance of ARFI imaging in terms of technical failure, interobserver agreement, and/or intraobserver agreement. The proportion of technical failure and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interobserver and intraobserver agreement was pooled. The pooled estimates of native and transplanted kidneys were obtained separately. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies (2993 patients) were included. The pooled proportions of technical failure were 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-8.5%) and 6.6% (95% CI 4.0-10.7%) in native and transplanted kidneys, respectively. The pooled ICCs of interobserver agreement were 0.70 (95% CI 0.68-0.83) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.89), indicating moderate and good agreement in native and transplanted kidneys, respectively. The pooled ICC showed good (0.77; 95% CI 0.49-0.91) intraobserver agreement in native kidneys. Regarding interobserver agreement in transplanted kidneys, ROI location (mid pole only versus others) was a significant factor of heterogeneity (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The ARFI-based SWE techniques show good technical performance for measuring renal parenchymal stiffness. The wide range of SWE protocols necessitates development of standardized guidelines on the use of renal ARFI imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Renal parenchymal stiffness (n=2,993). Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging was evaluated on Proportion of technical failure in native kidneys (95% CI 2.2-8.5). ARFI imaging showed good technical performance for measuring renal parenchymal stiffness, with pooled technical failure rates of 4.3% in native and 6.6% in transplanted kidneys.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: