Key result
Closed antimicrobial irrigation eradicates localized device pocket infections without lead removal in 100% of cases.
Why the study?
Lead removal for infected cardiac rhythm management device sites may not be feasible for patients at very high risk or lacking access to necessary technology or resources.
Does conservative management with a closed antimicrobial irrigation system prevent recurrent infection in patients with localized CRMD pocket infections who cannot undergo lead removal?
Case Report (n=5)
Does conservative management with a closed antimicrobial irrigation system prevent recurrent infection in patients with localized CRMD pocket infections who cannot undergo lead removal?
Conservative management with a closed antimicrobial irrigation system may be a feasible alternative to complete system extraction for localized CRMD pocket infections in high-risk patients.
May support conservative management of infected CRMDs in select high-risk patients; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
AIMS: Current guidelines recommend that patients with infected cardiac rhythm management device (CRMD) sites undergo removal of all system components (pulse-generator and leads). However, lead removal may not be an option for patients who lack access to state-of-the-art technology, lack the necessary financial resources, or are at very high risk because of age or concomitant disease. In this case series, we report our successful experience with conservative treatment of five such patients, who had CRMD infections localized to the device pocket. METHODS AND RESULTS: The device pocket and remaining hardware were completely sterilized to successfully eradicate the infection. First, all non-viable tissue, chronically inflamed tissue, granulation tissue, and scar tissue were completely removed, with special attention to complete haemostasis. Secondly, all non-essential foreign materials, including old sutures and plastic suture anchoring sleeves, were removed, and the remaining hardware was completely sterilized. To achieve this goal, we used mechanical means (scrubbing and pulsed lavage), as well as a closed antimicrobial irrigation system. In all five cases, the pulse-generator site was saved, lead removal was avoided, and the patients were free of local or systemic infection for a minimum of 1 year after treatment. CONCLUSION: Our conservative approach to the management of infected CRMD sites is feasible and beneficial in selected patients who are at very high risk for lead removal or who lack access to the technology necessary for safe performance of this procedure, provided that the infection is limited to the implant site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José A. López (2012) conducted a case report in Infected cardiac rhythm management device (CRMD) sites localized to the device pocket (n=5). Conservative management with a closed antimicrobial irrigation system and mechanical sterilization was evaluated on Freedom from local or systemic infection and avoidance of lead removal. Conservative management using a closed antimicrobial irrigation system successfully eradicated localized device pocket infections and avoided lead removal in all 5 patients at 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: