Key result
Blood pressure variability shows no link to cardiovascular mortality in T2D without prior CVD.
Why the study?
Blood pressure variability has been associated with cardiovascular risk independently of mean BP, but its incremental prognostic value in type 2 diabetes is unclear.
Does systolic blood pressure variability predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=9,855)
Yes
Does systolic blood pressure variability predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 1.01 (95% CI 0.89–1.15)
p-value: p=0.87
Systolic blood pressure variability does not provide clinically useful incremental prognostic value for mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes beyond standard risk factors including mean blood pressure.
Does not support using BP variability for mortality risk stratification in T2D without CVD; leaves open its prognostic role in other subgroups or endpoints.
OBJECTIVE: Blood pressure variability (BPV) has been associated with risk of cardiovascular events in observational studies, independently of mean BP levels. In states with higher autonomic imbalance, such as in diabetes, the importance of BP variability may theoretically be even greater. We aimed to investigate the incremental value of BPV for prediction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We identified 9,855 patients without pre-existing cardiovascular disease who did not change BP-lowering treatment during the observation period from a Swedish primary health care cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. BPV was summarized as the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), or variation independent of mean (VIM). Patients were followed for a median of 4 years and associations with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were investigated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: BPV was not associated with cardiovascular specific or all-cause mortality in the total sample. In patients who were not on BP-lowering drugs during the observation period (n = 2,949), variability measures were associated with all-cause mortality: hazard ratios were 1.05, 1.04 and 1.05 for 50% increases in SD, CV and VIM, respectively, adjusted for Framingham risk score risk factors, including mean BP. However, the addition of the variability measures in this subgroup only led to very minimal improvement in discrimination, indicating they may have limited clinical usefulness (change in C-statistic ranged from 0.000-0.003 in all models). CONCLUSIONS: Although BPV was independently associated with all-cause mortality in diabetes patients in primary care who did not have pre-existing cardiovascular disease or BP-lowering drugs, it may be of minimal clinical usefulness above and beyond that of other routinely measured predictors, including mean BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bell et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=9,855). Blood pressure variability vs. Lower blood pressure variability was evaluated on Cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89-1.15, p=0.87). Blood pressure variability was not associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes without pre-existing cardiovascular disease (HR 1.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: