Key result
Pectoral ICD implantation under conscious sedation is well tolerated with a 24-hour pain score of 34.
Why the study?
Postoperative pain following pectoral ICD implantation using conscious sedation has not been systematically studied.
Observational (n=21)
Pectoral ICD implantation using conscious sedation is well tolerated, with postoperative discomfort correlating with longer procedural times and larger intraoperative narcotic requirements.
Supports tolerability of conscious sedation for pectoral ICDs; hypothesis-generating observational data require randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: The miniaturization of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has made pectoral implantation possible. However, postoperative pain following the procedure has not been systematically studied. The aim of the current study was to prospectively assess patient discomfort and identify factors influencing pain perception during follow-up. METHODS: Pain related to device implantation was quantified in 21 consecutive patients (age, 61 +/- 11 years; 17 men and 21 women; 16 of 21 had coronary artery disease; left ventricular ejection fraction, 32% +/- 15%) undergoing pectoral ICD implantation with conscious sedation (fentanyl 118 +/- 72 micrograms midazolam 14 +/- 9 mg). Patients completed the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire 24 hours and 1 month postoperatively. Regression analysis was used to define clinical and procedure related variables affecting patient discomfort and frequency of postoperative analgesic use. RESULTS: The mean VAS score was 34 +/- 20 24 hours postoperatively. A single (4.8%) patient described postoperative pain as severe. Pain was reported to be moderate by 10 (47.6%) patients and mild by 10 (47.6%) patients. Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was a predictor of postoperative pain (R = 0.51, P = 0.036), and procedural duration was a strong predictor of postoperative analgesic use (R = 0.75, P < 0.001). Pain at 1 month decreased to a VAS score of 19 +/- 18 (P = 0.002 vs 24 hours) and was rated to be severe, moderate, and mild by 1, 3, and 17 patients, respectively. Late pain was related to a VAS score at 24 hours (R = 0.67, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Pectoral ICD implantation using conscious sedation is well tolerated. (2) Postoperative discomfort correlates with longer procedural times and larger intraoperative narcotic requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bollmann et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Postoperative pain following pectoral ICD implantation (n=21). Pectoral ICD implantation with conscious sedation was evaluated on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 24 hours postoperatively. Pectoral ICD implantation using conscious sedation was well tolerated, with a mean VAS pain score of 34 at 24 hours that significantly decreased to 19 at 1 month (P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: