Key result
Prasugrel in triple therapy linked to ~220% higher TIMI bleeding risk versus clopidogrel.
Cohort (n=377)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical evaluation reveals outcomes of combining aspirin, prasugrel, and vitamin K antagonists after stenting, highlighting bleeding risks with intensive triple regimens.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate whether prasugrel may serve as an alternative to clopidogrel in patients with triple therapy. BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of patients who receive dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention have an indication for oral anticoagulation and are thus treated with triple therapy. The standard adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker in this setting is clopidogrel. Data regarding prasugrel as part of triple therapy are not available. METHODS: We analyzed a consecutive series of 377 patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation and had an indication for oral anticoagulation between February 2009 and December 2011 and were treated with a 6-month regimen of aspirin and oral anticoagulation with either prasugrel or clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was a composite of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding at 6 months. The secondary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or definite stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (5.6%) received prasugrel instead of clopidogrel. These patients had a higher-risk profile at baseline, and the majority had high platelet reactivity to clopidogrel. TIMI major and minor bleeding occurred significantly more often in the prasugrel compared with the clopidogrel group (6 [28.6%) vs. 24 [6.7%]; unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 11.4], p < 0.001; adjusted HR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 9.1], p = 0.03). There was no significant difference regarding the combined ischemic secondary endpoint (2 [9.5%] vs. 25 [7.0%]; unadjusted HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.3 to 6.1], p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that substitution of prasugrel for clopidogrel in patients needing triple therapy increases the risk of bleeding. However, specific randomized trials are needed to define the role of newer adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarafoff et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Drug-eluting stent implantation with an indication for oral anticoagulation (n=377). Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Composite of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding at 6 months (adjusted HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 9.1, p=0.03). Prasugrel as part of triple therapy increased the risk of TIMI major and minor bleeding at 6 months compared with clopidogrel.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: