Key result
E2 protein with ISA 201VG adjuvant boosts APPV-specific immune responses in mice versus IMS 1313VG.
Why the study?
An effective subunit vaccine against atypical porcine pestivirus based on the E2 protein was needed to control APPV infection.
May advance APPV subunit vaccine platforms; leaves open in vivo efficacy against congenital tremor in piglets.
An atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV) causing congenital tremor type A-II in piglets was identified in China in 2016. An increased number of cases of APPV have been reported in various countries all over the world since 2015. This study aimed to develop an effective subunit vaccine against APPV based on the E2 protein, which is the main immunogenicity protein of APPV. In this study, E2 protein was successfully expressed by the baculovirus expression system. E2 protein was confirmed by Western blot assay, which showed that E2 protein possesses N-linked glycosylation sites. The immunogenicity of E2 subunit vaccine was evaluated in mice. The E2 protein emulsified with ISA 201VG adjuvant induced significantly higher levels of APPV-specific antibodies and elicited stronger lymphocyte proliferative responses and higher interleukin-10 secretion than those of the E2 protein emulsified with IMS 1313VG adjuvant. This observation indicates that the E2 subunit vaccine induces a Th2-type immune response. Our results showed that E2 protein can be developed as a safe and effective subunit vaccine for the control of APPV infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2018) studied Atypical porcine pestivirus (APPV) infection. E2 protein emulsified with ISA 201VG adjuvant vs. E2 protein emulsified with IMS 1313VG adjuvant was evaluated on APPV-specific antibodies, lymphocyte proliferative responses, and interleukin-10 secretion. The E2 protein emulsified with ISA 201VG adjuvant induced significantly higher APPV-specific antibodies, lymphocyte proliferation, and IL-10 secretion in mice than with IMS 1313VG adjuvant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: