Key result
Healive yields slightly higher long-term antibody titers than Havrix, maintaining seroconversion in ~90% of recipients.
Why the study?
Statistical-modeling approaches are needed to predict the long-term duration of immune protection induced by hepatitis A vaccination due to difficulties in decade-long follow-ups.
Does the Healive hepatitis A vaccine provide comparable long-term immune protection to Havrix in children?
RCT (n=375)
randomized
Does the Healive hepatitis A vaccine provide comparable long-term immune protection to Havrix in children?
Statistical modeling based on 5-year trial data predicts that the Healive hepatitis A vaccine provides durable immune protection for at least 30 years, comparable to Havrix.
Modeling supports Healive as a durable alternative to Havrix in children; leaves open prospective serosurveillance to confirm 30-year protection.
OBJECTIVE: the hepatitis A vaccine is essential for the prevention of disease from the hepatitis A virus (HAV). Due to documented difficulties during decade-long follow-ups after receiving vaccines, statistical-modeling approaches have been applied to predict the duration of immune protection. METHODS: Based on five-year follow-up data from a randomized positive-controlled trial among Chinese children (1-8 years old) following a 0, 6 months vaccination schedule, a power-law model accounting for the kinetics of B-cell turnover, as well as a modified power-law model considering a memory-B-cell subpopulation, were fitted to predict the long-term immune responses induced by HAV vaccination (Healive or Havrix). Anti-HAV levels of each individual and seroconversion rates up to 30 years after vaccination were predicted. RESULTS: A total of 375 participants who completed the two-dose vaccination were included in the analysis. Both models predicted that, over a life-long period, participants vaccinated with Healive would have close but slightly higher antibody titers than those of participants vaccinated with Havrix. Additionally, consistent with previous studies, more than 90% of participants were predicted to maintain seroconversion for at least 30 years. Moreover, the modified power-law model predicted that the antibody titers would reach a plateau level after nearly 15 years post-vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: induction of memory B cells to provide stable and durable immune protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Hepatitis A (n=375). Healive (inactivated, preservative-free hepatitis A vaccine) vs. Havrix was evaluated on Anti-HAV levels and seroconversion rates up to 30 years after vaccination. Healive vaccination was predicted to induce slightly higher long-term antibody titers than Havrix, with >90% of participants maintaining seroconversion for at least 30 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: