Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Adjuvant treatments are often employed in pemphigus vulgaris (PV) to reduce dependence on corticosteroids. When first-line adjuvants are ineffective, considering alternative adjuvant therapies may be necessary. Dapsone and sulfasalazine represent two options. Objective: To evaluate the use of dapsone and sulfasalazine in the treatment of PV. Methods: A PubMed search identified patients with PV treated with dapsone or sulfasalazine. We included all studies with ≥3 patients published in English between 1980 and December 2022. Clinical improvement was defined as disease control or complete remission (when adjuvant therapy was initiated in uncontrolled disease) and as a reduction of corticosteroids to ≤7.5 mg per day (when adjuvant therapy was initiated in controlled disease). Results: Eleven studies were identified representing 75 patients treated with dapsone and 66 patients treated with sulfasalazine. Six patients received dapsone monotherapy, and all had clinical improvement. Sixty-nine received adjuvant dapsone, leading to clinical improvement in 40 (58%). Fifty-seven patients received sulfasalazine as an adjuvant to intravenous corticosteroids, leading to clinical improvement in 49 (86%). The remaining 9 patients received sulfasalazine following rituximab, and all had clinical improvement. Conclusions: Dapsone and sulfasalazine have evidence supporting their efficacy and can be considered when first-line adjuvant therapies are unsuccessful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: