Key result
Transfemoral SAPIEN 3 implantation without pre-dilation proves feasible in ~95% of patients.
Why the study?
The feasibility of transfemoral implantation of the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN 3 device without prior balloon valvuloplasty was uncertain.
Is transfemoral implantation of the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN 3 device without prior balloon valvuloplasty feasible and successful in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=163)
Yes
Is transfemoral implantation of the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN 3 device without prior balloon valvuloplasty feasible and successful in patients with severe aortic stenosis?
Transfemoral TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 valve without predilatation is feasible in the vast majority of patients, though severe calcification may still necessitate predilatation.
May support selective omission of predilatation in SAPIEN 3 TAVI; leaves open randomized confirmation of outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether transfemoral implantation of the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN 3 device without prior balloon valvuloplasty is feasible. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without predilatation may be advantageous and is feasible with various transcatheter heart valves. METHODS: A total of 163 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI were enrolled at two sites. We assessed whether the crossing of the native aortic valve with the prosthesis without prior pre-dilation was feasible and evaluated for procedural success according to VARC-2 criteria. RESULTS: Direct implantation without pre-dilatation was feasible in 154 patients (94.5%), whereas in nine patients predilatation was required due to difficulties while crossing the native aortic valve. Procedural success was achieved in 85.6%. A large proportion of the procedural failures was mainly driven by increased post-procedural gradients ≥20 mm Hg, which almost exclusively concerned the smaller prostheses sizes (23-mm 10/39 (25.6%) vs. 26-mm 5/72 (6.9%) vs. 29-mm 1/52 (1.9%); P < 0.001). Patients in the pre-ballooning group had higher calcium scores of the aortic valve (5,335 [4,421-7,807] vs. 2,893 [1,879-3,993]), more advanced age, higher transvalvular gradients, and smaller aortic valve area. CONCLUSIONS: The transfemoral implantation of the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 prosthesis without pre-dilatation is feasible in the majority of cases. In the presence of severe aortic valve calcification and critical aortic stenosis, however, predilatation may still be necessary. Furthermore, the significance of increased post-procedural gradients requires further verification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Praz et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Severe aortic stenosis (n=163). Transfemoral TAVI with Edwards SAPIEN 3 without predilatation vs. TAVI with predilatation was evaluated on Feasibility of crossing the native aortic valve with the prosthesis without prior pre-dilation. Transfemoral implantation of the Edwards SAPIEN 3 prosthesis without pre-dilatation was feasible in 94.5% of patients, with an overall procedural success rate of 85.6%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: