Key result
Direct TAVR without pre-BAV resulted in shorter procedures and similar 30-day safety endpoints (13.5% vs 10.4%; p=0.059) compared to pre-BAV, but higher rates of permanent pacemaker implantation.
Why the study?
The impact of TAVR without preliminary balloon aortic valvuloplasty on periprocedural outcomes in a large real-world registry was not well established.
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement without preliminary balloon aortic valvuloplasty improve procedural and 30-day outcomes in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis at high surgical risk?
Observational (n=1,544)
Yes
Does transcatheter aortic valve replacement without preliminary balloon aortic valvuloplasty improve procedural and 30-day outcomes in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis at high surgical risk?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Direct TAVR without pre-BAV reduces procedural time but is unexpectedly associated with higher rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation and life-threatening bleeding compared to TAVR with pre-BAV.
AIMS: To investigate the impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) without preliminary balloon aortic valvuloplasty (pre-BAV) on periprocedural outcomes in a large, real-world registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SOURCE 3 registry was an observational, multi-center, single-arm study of patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis at high surgical risk treated with the SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve (THV). Procedural and 30-day outcomes were compared between two groups of 772 patients each (retrospectively matched) with or without pre-BAV. All baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and anatomical valve characteristics were comparable between groups except for Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score, which was lower in the direct TAVR group (6.0 ± 5.9 vs 7.8 ± 8.3; p = 0.003). In the direct TAVR group, there were less post-dilatations (8.1% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.002), shorter procedural time (70.9 ± 39.8 min vs 73.0 ± 32.2 min, p = 0.033) and fluoroscopy time (13.4 ± 7.0 min vs 14.9 ± 7.4 min, p < 0.001). Other procedural outcomes and echocardiographic variables at 30 days did not differ significantly between the two groups: safety endpoint (10.4% with pre-BAV vs 13.5% with direct TAVR, p = 0.059), mortality (2.1% vs 2.3%, p = 0.730), disabling strokes (0.4% vs 0.5%, p = 0.704), and moderate to severe paravalvular leak (PVL) (3.2% vs 2.2%, p = 0.40). Unexpectedly, new permanent pacemaker implantation and life-threatening bleeds were less frequently observed with pre-BAV group than with direct TAVR (10.4% vs 13.9%, p = 0.032 and 3.5% vs 6.5%, p = 0.007, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this large TAVR dataset, direct implantation of the SAPIEN 3 THV without pre-BAV was feasible and safe and resulted in shorter procedures, without impact on 30-day prosthesis function and PVL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dumonteil et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis at high surgical risk (n=1,544). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement without preliminary balloon aortic valvuloplasty (direct TAVR) vs. TAVR with preliminary balloon aortic valvuloplasty (pre-BAV) was evaluated on Safety endpoint at 30 days (p=0.059). Direct TAVR without pre-BAV resulted in shorter procedures and similar 30-day safety endpoints (13.5% vs 10.4%; p=0.059) compared to pre-BAV, but higher rates of permanent pacemaker implantation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: