Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The thermal degradation of milled coffee waste was investigated in a fixed‐bed reactor using iso‐conversional kinetic modelling, yielding an average activation energy of 43.94 kJ mol−1. A central composite design optimisation was performed, and the optimal operating conditions were identified as 370 °C, 5 °C min−1, and 48 min to produce 328.42 g biochar and 109.74 g aqueous fraction per batch (750 g) of feedstock. The optimal process consumes 0.49 kWh energy, and the model was repeated with 98.16% accuracy. Techno‐economic analysis demonstrated strong viability with a net present value of INR 41,607.3, internal return rate of 14%, and a payback period of 9.18 months. A cradle‐to‐gate life-cycle assessment compared pyrolysis to gasification, combustion, and composting. Pyrolysis emitted 150 kg CO2 and 1.62 kg CH4 (198.6 kg CO2-eq/t), sequestering 437.33 kg C in biochar (–306.133 kg CO2-eq) for a net global warming potential (GWP) of −107.53 kg CO2-eq and a positive energy balance (+1.76 MJ/t). Gasification, combustion, and composting exhibited higher net GWPs (135.6, 160.2, and 16.4 kg CO2-eq/t, respectively) and inferior energy balances. Optimised pyrolysis thus delivers superior biochar yield, energy recovery, economic return, and greenhouse‐gas mitigation among evaluated waste‐to‐energy routes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasidhar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: