Key result
ACE I/D polymorphism and circulating ACE levels show no association with mortality in septic patients.
Why the study?
Independent studies showed contradictory findings regarding the prognostic significance of the ACE I/D polymorphism D/D genotype in critically ill patients with sepsis.
Are ACE I/D polymorphism and serum ACE levels associated with mortality in critically ill septic patients?
Cohort (n=186)
Are ACE I/D polymorphism and serum ACE levels associated with mortality in critically ill septic patients?
p-value: p=0.59 and 0.34
ACE I/D polymorphism and serum ACE levels do not appear to be significant prognostic factors for clinical outcomes in critically ill septic patients.
Does not support ACE polymorphism or levels as mortality predictors in sepsis; leaves open genotype-specific therapeutic trials.
BACKGROUND: In critically ill patients independent studies have shown contradictory findings regarding the prognostic significance of the D/D genotype of the I/D angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) polymorphism. The study aim was to evaluate the effect of both ACE I/D polymorphism and ACE serum levels on the clinical outcomes of critically ill septic patients. METHODS: This study recruited 186 Caucasian patients with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock. Epidemiological, clinical data, co-morbidities and severity scores were recorded. Measurements of serum ACE activity and genotyping for ACE I/D polymorphism were carried out. Primary outcomes were the 28- and the 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes included the number of days without renal or cardiovascular failure and ventilation-free days over the 28-day period following study enrolment. RESULTS: Neither 28- nor 90-day mortality were associated with ACE I/D polymorphism (p=0.59 and 0.34, respectively) or circulating ACE levels (p=0.17 and 0.25, respectively). Similarly, ACE polymorphism and levels were not related to ventilation-free days (p=0.14 and 0.25, respectively), days without cardiovascular failure (p=0.14 and 0.81, respectively) and days without renal failure (p=0.64 and 0.27, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Neither ACE I/D polymorphism nor serum ACE levels seem to be significant prognostic factors of clinical outcomes in septic, critically ill patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsantes et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock (n=186). ACE I/D polymorphism and circulating ACE levels was evaluated on 28- and 90-day mortality (p=0.59 and 0.34). ACE I/D polymorphism and circulating ACE levels were not associated with 28- or 90-day mortality in critically ill septic patients (p=0.59 and 0.34 for polymorphism).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: