Key result
IV carperitide linked to higher in-hospital mortality, longer stays, and greater costs versus nitrates in AHF.
Why the study?
Carperitide has been widely used as a vasodilator in Japanese acute heart failure patients despite limited evidence and concerns from related agents' negative impacts.
Does intravenous carperitide compared to nitrates improve in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=39,427)
Yes
Does intravenous carperitide compared to nitrates improve in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
In patients with acute heart failure, first-line vasodilator therapy with intravenous carperitide is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, longer hospital stays, and greater costs compared to nitrates.
May discourage carperitide over nitrates in acute HF; leaves open whether RCTs would confirm these observational associations.
Background: Carperitide (CAR) is a recombinantly produced intravenous formulation of human atrial natriuretic peptide. Despite of negative impacts of nesiritide on clinical outcomes for acute heart failure (AHF), CAR has been used for around a half of Japanese AHF patients as a vasodilator based on limited evidences. Purpose: This study sought to determine the effect of CAR compared to nitrates in the early care for AHF patients treated with vasodilators. Methods and results: We conducted a cohort study of patients admitted with AHF to 808 hospitals from April 2012 to March 2014. Patients were extracted from 1,422,703 hospitalizations according to ICD-10 HF codes. Patients who had sepsis or mechanical supports during hospitalization were excluded. Outcomes were in-hospital death, length of hospitalization and cost of hospitalization. Among 78,114 patients, 39,427 were in patients treated with either CAR or nitrates during the first 2 days (CAR; 28,129, nitrates; 11,298). After application of inverse probability of treatment weighting with variables including demographics, comorbidities and treatments, there was perfect balance in both groups. Patients who were treated with CAR had substantially higher covariate adjusted in-hospital mortality, longer length of hospitalization and greater cost of hospitalization compared to those treated with nitrates (Table1).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagai et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (n=39,427). Intravenous carperitide vs. Nitrates was evaluated on In-hospital death, length of hospitalization, and cost of hospitalization. Intravenous carperitide was associated with higher covariate-adjusted in-hospital mortality, longer hospitalization, and greater costs compared to nitrates in 39,427 acute heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: