Key result
Infant mechanical MVR is linked to 21% in-hospital mortality and high mid-term reintervention rates.
Why the study?
Early and mid-term outcomes after mitral valve replacement with 15- to 17-mm mechanical prostheses in infants were not well characterized.
Cohort (n=61)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mitral valve replacement with 15- to 17-mm mechanical prostheses is a viable life-saving option for critically ill infants, though it carries significant mortality and a high rate of eventual prosthesis replacement for outgrowth.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate early and mid-term outcomes (mortality and prosthetic valve reintervention) after mitral valve replacement with 15- to 17-mm mechanical prostheses. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed among patients who underwent mitral valve replacement with a 15- to 17-mm mechanical prosthesis at 6 congenital cardiac centers: 5 in The Netherlands and 1 in the United States. Baseline, operative, and follow-up data were evaluated. RESULTS: Mitral valve replacement was performed in 61 infants (15 mm, n = 17 [28%]; 16 mm, n = 18 [29%]; 17 mm, n = 26 [43%]), of whom 27 (47%) were admitted to the intensive care unit before surgery and 22 (39%) required ventilator support. Median age at surgery was 5.9 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3.2-17.4), and median weight was 5.7 kg (IQR, 4.5-8.8). There were 13 in-hospital deaths (21%) and 8 late deaths (17%, among 48 hospital survivors). Major adverse events occurred in 34 (56%). Median follow-up was 4.0 years (IQR, 0.4-12.5) First prosthetic valve replacement (n = 27 [44%]) occurred at a median of 3.7 years (IQR, 1.9-6.8). Prosthetic valve endocarditis was not reported, and there was no mortality related to prosthesis replacement. Other reinterventions included permanent pacemaker implantation (n = 9 [15%]), subaortic stenosis resection (n = 4 [7%]), aortic valve repair (n = 3 [5%], and aortic valve replacement (n = 6 [10%]). CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve replacement with 15- to 17-mm mechanical prostheses is an important alternative to save critically ill neonates and infants in whom the mitral valve cannot be repaired. Prosthesis replacement for outgrowth can be carried out with low risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
IJsselhof et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve disease requiring replacement (n=61). Mitral valve replacement with 15- to 17-mm mechanical prostheses was evaluated on Early and mid-term outcomes (mortality and prosthetic valve reintervention). Mitral valve replacement with 15- to 17-mm mechanical prostheses in infants resulted in 21% in-hospital mortality and a 44% rate of first prosthetic valve replacement over a median 4.0 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: